인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
DNA methylation analysis has become a powerful tool in neuropathology. Although DNA methylation-based classification usually shows high accuracy, certain samples cannot be classified and remain clinically challenging. We aimed to gain insight into these cases from a clinical perspective. To address, central nervous system (CNS) tumors were subjected to DNA methylation profiling and classified according to their calibrated score using the DKFZ brain tumor classifier (V11.4) as "≥ 0.84" (score ≥ 0.84), "0.3-0.84" (score 0.3-0.84), or "< 0.3" (score < 0.3). Histopathology, patient characteristics, DNA input amount, and tumor purity were correlated. Clinical outcome parameters were time to treatment decision, progression-free, and overall survival. In 1481 patients, the classifier identified 69 (4.6%) tumors with an unreliable score as "< 0.3". Younger age (P < 0.01) and lower tumor purity (P < 0.01) compromised accurate classification. A clinical impact was demonstrated as unclassifiable cases ("< 0.3") had a longer time to treatment decision (P < 0.0001). In a subset of glioblastomas, these cases experienced an increased time to adjuvant treatment start (P < 0.001) and unfavorable survival (P < 0.025). Although DNA methylation profiling adds an important contribution to CNS tumor diagnostics, clinicians should be aware of a potentially longer time to treatment initiation, especially in malignant brain tumors.
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
