인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Abstract Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with dysfunctional diaphragmatic breathing we assess the diaphragmatic excursion at different stages of COPD patients by transthoracic ultrasound. Objective The present study aimed to assess the diaphragmatic excursion at different stages of COPD patients by transthoracic ultrasound. Patients and methods In this observational case–control study, 80 COPD patients were included according to GOLD guidelines 2020 attending the Chest Clinic in Badr Hospital, Helwan University. All patients were divided equally into 5 groups according to FEV1 measured by spirometer: group (1) normal person; group (2) mild stage FEV1_80% predicted; group (3) moderate stage 50%_FEV1 < 80% predicted; group (4) severe stage 30%_FEV1 < 50% predicted; and group (5) very severe stage FEV1 < 30% predicted. We measured diaphragmatic movement in all these patients using ultrasound. Results The outcomes result of normal, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe groups in terms of post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC are 0.66 ± 0.05, 0.65 ± 0.05, 0.63 ± 0.04, 0.51 ± 0.068 respectively showed was a significant difference. There was a significant difference of FEV1 are 86.70 ± 5.62, 63.00 ± 13.81, 43.00 ± 6.78, 24.00 ± 4.17, respectively ( P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in diaphragmatic thickness at the end of normal expiration are 0.49 ± 0.12, 0.51 ± 0.09, 0.47 ± 0.16, 0.37 ± 0.07, respectively ( P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the diaphragmatic thickness during maximum inspiration are 0.70 ± 0.16, 0.8 ± 0.17, 0.64 ± 0.19, and 0.47 ± 0.08, respectively ( P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the diaphragmatic excursion during normal breathing are 2.45 ± 0.39, 1.78 ± 0.67, 1.86 ± 0.67, 1.09 ± 0.16, respectively ( P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in diaphragmatic Excursion during maximum inspiration are 4.41 ± 0.91, 3.83 ± 0.78, 3.36 ± 0.74, 2.36 ± 0.66 respectively ( P < 0.001). Conclusion The use of ultrasonography for assessing the diaphragmatic excursion. Sonographically determined diaphragmatic excursion strongly correlates with FEV1/FVC.
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
