인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Abstract Objectives Blood collection, one of the most frequently performed procedures in healthcare settings. The study aimed to develop a scale for phlebotomy procedures based on national phlebotomy guidelines and to assess the tendencies of phlebotomy personnel in certain blood collection practices. Methods The survey included a 5-point likert scale, which consisted of 20 items and multiple-choice questions. The survey was disseminated to the attendees via an online platform (Google Forms ® , Mountain View, CA, USA), and they were requested to complete it, and a total of 1,439 participants were included in the study. Results The data showed that the scale complied with the guidelines and was highly valid and reliable. A significant finding from the study indicates that 47.9 % of the participants (689 individuals) chose the syringe response during the blood collection procedure. The variable of prior phlebotomy training exhibited no statistically significant effect on these responses (χ²=1.893, p=0.093). A statistically significant difference was observed in the frequency of tendencies for using intravenous cannulas/catheters in inpatient settings (p<0.05). Conclusions The standardization of blood collection practices may be enhanced through the implementation of these procedures by specialized medical professionals. It is necessary to audit the quality of current practices and identify the most vulnerable steps in phlebotomy. The implementation of phlebotomy guidelines in healthcare settings should be encouraged. Furthermore, greater commitment is required from relevant authorities to develop educational programs and establish continuous education courses for healthcare phlebotomy personnel.
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.