인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Abstract Aim The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of single or double lead in percutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Method Follow-up data of 41 patients (20 patients with double lead, 21 patients with single lead) who underwent percutaneous SCS were analysed. Demographic and clinical examination findings (gender, age, pain characteristic, neurological examination, medications used) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded. VAS pain scores, clinical and neurological examination and complication findings were recorded at 1st and 12th months at post-procedure follow-up. Results Twenty patients had double lead and 21 patients had single lead. Five patients had root avulsion, 1 patient had complex regional pain syndrome, 1 patient had postherpetic neuralgia, 2 patients had phantom pain, 3 patients had ischaemic pain and 29 patients had postlaminectomy syndrome. In 10 patients, leads were placed in the cervical region and in 31 patients in the thoracic region. There was at least 50% reduction in VAS scores in 71.4% (15 patients) with single lead implantation and 65% (13 patients) with double lead implantation ( p = 0.7). Infection was significantly higher in patients with double lead than in patients with single lead implantation ( p < 0.05). In 1 patient, generator exchange was performed because the generator was exposed due to skin necrosis. No major complication was recorded. Conclusion SCS with single and double lead is an effective method in chronic pain syndromes. SCS with single lead can be preferred in terms of time, cost and labour saving.
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
