인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Oral lichen planus is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory condition that significantly impacts QOL. Clinician-reported measures, such as the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS), systematically evaluate clinical severity but may not adequately reflect patient experience. Patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Chronic Oral Mucosal Disease Questionnaire (COMDQ-26), provide QOL insights, although their relationship with clinical severity remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess alignment between clinician-assessed severity (measured by ODSS) and patient-reported QOL (measured by COMDQ-26) in oral lichen planus across sex and disease subtypes as well as to identify key drivers of these scores. A retrospective review of 78 patients with oral lichen planus was conducted with assessment of demographics, disease subtypes, ODSS, COMDQ-26, and pain scores. Erythematous and erosive/ulcerative subtypes had the highest severity and QOL impact scores, with no significant score differences between these subtypes. ODSS components (site, activity, pain) contributed equally to total severity, whereas the COMDQ-26 patient support domain most strongly drove QOL scores. Moderate ODSS-COMDQ-26 correlations indicated only partial alignment between clinician- and patient-reported measures. We conclude that integrating patient-reported outcome measures into clinical practice and trials may improve oral lichen planus care through more comprehensive, individualized, and subtype-focused strategies.
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
