인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
ABSTRACT This study develops a comprehensive framework for mapping flood susceptibility and vulnerability in the Cheshmeh‐Kileh forest watershed in northern Iran by integrating remote sensing (RS), local knowledge, and machine learning (ML) algorithms. This was accomplished through the application of various MLs, such as K‐nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and Naive Bayes. In this study, flood susceptibility refers to the physical propensity of an area to experience flooding, influenced by geo‐environmental factors, while flood vulnerability captures the socio‐economic and institutional dimensions that determine a community's ability to cope with and recover from flood events. This research first identified critical geo‐environmental factors influencing flood susceptibility and utilized remote sensing to locate areas prone to runoff generation. Flood risk zoning was then implemented using machine learning techniques in Python. To assess flood vulnerability, data were collected from local residents via questionnaires, focusing on economic, infrastructural‐physical, institutional‐policy, and social‐cultural aspects. The flood vulnerability map was created by integrating these survey results with population density data to identify areas where high social exposure coincides with high physical susceptibility. Findings indicated that the combined remote sensing‐SVR model was the most effective for sensitivity classification, identifying sub‐watersheds 2 and 8 in the Sehezar River (a major basin within the study area) as the areas with the highest and lowest flooding susceptibility, respectively, with sub‐watershed 10 in the Dohezar River (another major basin) being the most vulnerable. The estimated values for Mean Absolute Error (0.041), Mean Square Error (0.042), Root Mean Square Error (0.205), and Area Under the Curve (0.980) demonstrated high model accuracy. The Friedman statistical test showed that the average scores for the different dimensions of vulnerability decreased in the order of: economic (0.48), social‐cultural (0.44), infrastructural‐physical (0.34), and institutional‐policy (0.28). Consequently, the economic dimension was prioritized for its highest score. Flood vulnerability mapping revealed that sub‐watersheds 5, 11, 14, and 15, which had higher population densities, were naturally more vulnerable to floods. This finding reflects a direct relationship between population density and flood vulnerability. Overall, this study underscores the urgent need for effective planning and preventive strategies to mitigate flood risks and enhance resilience in the region.
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
