인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
ABSTRACT Background Digital health technologies promise a future of efficient, empowered patients and improved clinical outcomes. However, real‐world clinical experience reveals a more nuanced picture. Through encounters with tools like myCOPD, the NHS App and Oviva, it becomes clear that these systems hold a dual potential: they can either strengthen the therapeutic alliance or subtly erode it. On the one hand, rigid digital pathways risk excluding older adults, and strict app adherence can sometimes mask dangerous clinical deterioration, prioritising algorithmic convenience over lived expertise. On the other hand, when applied flexibly and aligned with patient preferences, technology powerfully enhances health literacy and fosters meaningful engagement. Key themes and Implications for practice This dichotomy highlights that the success of digital healthcare cannot be measured by adoption rates or technical sophistication alone. True effectiveness is found in a tool's capacity to honour patient autonomy, preserve personal identity and ultimately deepen human connection. Therefore, integrating digital health requires more than deploying software; it demands a deliberate fusion of technology with clinical judgement, compassionate communication and co‐designed choices. As healthcare becomes increasingly digitised, our ultimate metric must be whether these systems amplify patient voices and support care that is guided by one essential question: ‘What works best for you?’
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
