메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김순진 (창원대학교, 창원대학교 대학원)

지도교수
정대영
발행연도
2018
저작권
창원대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수4

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ABSTRACT

Facilitating Method of Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education and Its Application Effect in Job Functional Education

The purpose of this study is to investigate the overall perception, practice experiences and performances of the Evidence-Based Practice among special school teachers. Based on the results, I tried to find ways to settle Evidence-Based Practice in special education in order to enhance educational performance for students who need special education and to identify what the special education is. I also looked into the results of applying Evidence-Based Practice to vocational skill education. Furthermore, this study was carried out to find out the differences in performance experiences and performance ability of respondents by sampling 479 special school teachers and selecting 239 teachers among them through systematic sampling method.
As a result, there were statistically significant differences in general understanding of Evidence-Based Practice depending on special teachers’ final education level. The differences were shown in performance experiences as well depending on whether the teachers were homeroom teachers or not. Also, there was statistically significant differences in performance ability perceived by special school teachers depending on their final education level and work experiences.
Based on the results of the research, I tried to bring out how to establish Evidence-Based Practice in the field of special education for the benefit of the students. For this, 7 special education teachers who knew and applied Evidence-Based Practice were selected as the study participants and the interview with a focus group was conducted. As a result, a total of three categories and eight subcategories were derived.
The three categories were (1) Settlement plan of Evidence-Based Practice in terms of special education policy, (2) The way of settling Evidence-Based Practice in terms of unit-school, and (3) The way of settling Evidence-Based Practice in terms of special school teachers.
The purpose of special education emphasizes the need for special education which helps students fulfill desirable roles in society after graduation. For this, six students with intellectual disabilities were subjected to the Wilcoxon sign rank test. This was done by applying Evidence - based communication skill as the target teaching strategy into their choice practice in vocational education.
The results of this study were as follows: First, there was a statistically significant difference in the subcategories of job attitude and independence for career search and decision. However, there were not much differences in planning. Also, while there were statistically significant differences in the subcategories of self-understanding, information search, and desired job knowledge, there was no significant difference in rational communication. This differences were shown in career search and activity, which was a subcategory of behavior. Second, in order to find out the ability to do occupational performances, Evidence-Based practical teaching strategy on daily life was applied to the vocational course, which was an optional Barista course. There were seven subcategories : a coffee botany, a management of coffee machine, espresso, americano, milk-steaming, cappuccino, and service attitude and hygiene. Every participant showed significant differences in all subcategories. In order to acquire skills on the jobs, adopting Evidence-Based Practice and a customized curriculum for the disabled seemed very effective as students were able to practice repetitively until they fully get the knack of the skills they need to be Baristas.

Key Words: Evidence-Based Practice, Recognition, Performance Experience, Performance Ability, Student teaching, Focus group interview, Qualitative research, Job Vocational Education, Selection Practice, Barista Vocabulary, Job Performance ability.

목차

차 례
Ⅰ. 서론 1
1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
2. 연구 문제 7
3. 용어의 정의 8
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 10
1. 증거기반실제의 이해 10
2. 특수교육과 증거기반실제 17
3. 지적장애의 특징 21
4. 전공과 직업기능교육 27
5. 선행 연구 36
Ⅲ. 연구 방법 40
1. 인식 연구 40
1) 연구 대상 40
2) 연구 도구 41
3) 연구 설계 및 절차 44
4) 자료처리 및 분석 46
5) 연구 신뢰도 46
6) 연구 타당도 46
2. 정착 방안 연구 47
1) 연구 대상 47
2) 연구 도구 48
3) 연구 설계 및 절차 50
4) 자료처리 및 분석 51
5) 연구 신뢰도 53
6) 연구 타당도 53
3. 직업기능교육에서의 적용 연구 54
1) 연구 대상 54
2) 연구 도구 56
3) 연구 설계 및 절차 58
4) 자료처리 및 분석 64
5) 연구 신뢰도 64
6) 연구 타당도 65
Ⅳ. 연구 결과 66
1. 특수학교 교사 변인에 따른 증거기반실제에 대한 인식 차이 66
1) 전반적 인식 차이 66
2) 수행 경험 차이 73
3) 수행 능력 차이 77
2. 특수교사가 인식하는 증거기반실제의 특수교육 정착 방안 81
1) 특수교육 정책 차원 81
2) 단위학교 차원 87
3) 특수교사 차원 91
3. 직업기능교육에서의 적용 97
1) 연구대상자별 태도, 능력, 행동의 변화 98
2) 직업수행 능력의 변화 105
Ⅴ. 논의 112
1. 연구 방법에 대한 논의 112
2. 연구 결과에 대한 논의 117
Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론 126
1. 요약 및 결론 126
2. 제언 130
참고 문헌 132
ABSTRACT 144
부록 147

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0