인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 이성희
- 발행연도
- 2025
- 저작권
- 경북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수4
초록· 키워드
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
The purpose of this study was to find out the differences in sexual experience and influencing factors of youth according to gender after COVID-19
This study was conducted on 104,718 youth using secondary data from the Youth Health Behavior Online Survey in 2022 and 2023. The dada were analyzed using frequency analysis, χ² test, composite sample general linear model t-test, logistic regression.
Among general characteristics, household economic status and academic achievement showed gender differences. Males in the "high" economic group were 1.4 times more likely to have sexual intercourse experience compared to the "middle" group(CI: 1.28–1.53, p<.001), while females in the "low" group were 1.51 times more likely(CI: 1.32–1.72, p<.001). For academic achievement, males in the "high" group were 1.13 times more likely(CI: 1.02–1.26, p=.025), whereas females in the "low" group were 1.17 times more likely(CI: 1.03–1.32, p=.014).
In health behavior, gender differences were observed in smartphone usage time. Males with weekday usage of "200 minutes or more" had 1.15 times higher likelihood of sexual intercourse experience(CI: 1.04–1.26, p=.005), while females showed no significant association. Conversely, females with weekend usage of "400 minutes or more" were 1.21 times more likely(CI: 1.07–1.36, p=.003), with no significant association for males.
For mental health state, suicidal ideation and loneliness showed gender differences. Males with suicidal thoughts were 1.19 times more likely to have sexual intercourse experience(CI: 1.04–1.36, p=.012), while females showed no association. In loneliness, females reporting "middle" and "high" levels were 1.24 times(CI: 1.09–1.41, p=.001) and 1.47 times(CI: 1.25–1.73, p<.001) more likely, respectively, with no association for males.
This study identified significant gender-specific differences in youth sexual intercourse experiences after COVID-19. Key factors influencing these differences included household economic status, academic achievement, weekday and weekend smartphone usage time, suicidal ideation, and loneliness. Additionally, comparisons with pre-COVID-19 trends revealed differences in household economic status, academic achievement, school sexual education, and suicidal ideation.
It can be used as a basis for identifying gender differences in sexual intercourse experience and analyzing changing patterns during new infectious diseases. This data can support the development of customized policies and educational programs. In particular, for mental health factors showing gender differences, such as suicidal ideation and loneliness, it can serve as a foundation for comprehensive youth sexual health policies and sexual education programs that include mental health factors.
This study was conducted on 104,718 youth using secondary data from the Youth Health Behavior Online Survey in 2022 and 2023. The dada were analyzed using frequency analysis, χ² test, composite sample general linear model t-test, logistic regression.
Among general characteristics, household economic status and academic achievement showed gender differences. Males in the "high" economic group were 1.4 times more likely to have sexual intercourse experience compared to the "middle" group(CI: 1.28–1.53, p<.001), while females in the "low" group were 1.51 times more likely(CI: 1.32–1.72, p<.001). For academic achievement, males in the "high" group were 1.13 times more likely(CI: 1.02–1.26, p=.025), whereas females in the "low" group were 1.17 times more likely(CI: 1.03–1.32, p=.014).
In health behavior, gender differences were observed in smartphone usage time. Males with weekday usage of "200 minutes or more" had 1.15 times higher likelihood of sexual intercourse experience(CI: 1.04–1.26, p=.005), while females showed no significant association. Conversely, females with weekend usage of "400 minutes or more" were 1.21 times more likely(CI: 1.07–1.36, p=.003), with no significant association for males.
For mental health state, suicidal ideation and loneliness showed gender differences. Males with suicidal thoughts were 1.19 times more likely to have sexual intercourse experience(CI: 1.04–1.36, p=.012), while females showed no association. In loneliness, females reporting "middle" and "high" levels were 1.24 times(CI: 1.09–1.41, p=.001) and 1.47 times(CI: 1.25–1.73, p<.001) more likely, respectively, with no association for males.
This study identified significant gender-specific differences in youth sexual intercourse experiences after COVID-19. Key factors influencing these differences included household economic status, academic achievement, weekday and weekend smartphone usage time, suicidal ideation, and loneliness. Additionally, comparisons with pre-COVID-19 trends revealed differences in household economic status, academic achievement, school sexual education, and suicidal ideation.
It can be used as a basis for identifying gender differences in sexual intercourse experience and analyzing changing patterns during new infectious diseases. This data can support the development of customized policies and educational programs. In particular, for mental health factors showing gender differences, such as suicidal ideation and loneliness, it can serve as a foundation for comprehensive youth sexual health policies and sexual education programs that include mental health factors.
목차
- Ⅰ. 서론 11. 연구의 필요성 12. 연구 목적 43. 용어 정의 5Ⅲ. 문헌 고찰 81. 청소년 성적 발달 특성 82. 코로나19가 청소년에게 미친 영향 103. 청소년 성경험 영향요인과 성별 차이 13Ⅲ. 연구 방법 161. 연구 설계 162. 연구 대상 163. 연구 도구 184. 자료 수집 방법 215. 윤리적 고려 226. 자료 분석 방법 23Ⅳ. 연구 결과 241. 연구대상자의 성별에 따른 인구학적 특성의 차이 242-1. 연구대상자의 성별에 따른 건강행태의 차이 262-2. 연구대상자의 성별에 따른 정신건강 상태의 차이 283. 연구대상자의 성별에 따른 성경험의 차이 304. 연구대상자의 성별에 따른 성경험 영향요인의 차이 32Ⅴ. 논의 37Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 44참고문헌 45Abstract 54부록 56
최근 본 자료
