메뉴 건너뛰기

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 역사교육 제86집
발행연도
수록면
219 - 246 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

This article describes the Stoic economic ethics and the Stoic view on property, and explores the influence of Stoic economic ethics on Tiberius Gracchus' agrarian reform. At the time of the reform, the Senate was in a deep conflict between conservatives and reformers over political power. The two camps had different views on the property. The root of their differences can go back to the debate between Diogenes and Antipater over private property in the mid second century B.C.. Diogenes asserted: if one occupied ager publicus(public land), the land could be recognized as his private property. Antipater, however, took an opposit position. Conservatives in the Senate accepted the argument of Panaetius who took Diogenes's idea of private property while reformers did that of Blossius who developed the idea of Antipater's. According to Blossius, because ager publicus was a common wealth of Roman people, the government could take from and redistribute the lands that were possessed by powerful men. Based on the idea of Blossius, Tiberius Gracchus developed and launched Lex Sempronia agraria. Tiberius Gracchus tried to limit the size of large estates, with the government redistributing some land to the poor. He assured that the lands redistributed could not be bought nor be sell, and the people who got the land must pay the rent. The Senate opposed the plan and the Tiberius was assassinated by Scipio Nasica, the extreme conservative.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. 1. 서언
  2. 2. 기원전 2세기 중엽 스토아 학파의 경제 윤리
  3. 3. 그라쿠스 시대의 스토아 학파의 재산관
  4. 4. 티베리우스 그라쿠스의 농지 개혁의 신면모
  5. 5. 개혁과 보수 당파 간의 대립
  6. 6. 결어
  7. Abstract

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015493454