메뉴 건너뛰기

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(한림대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2021년 가을호(통권 제136호)
발행연도
수록면
93 - 124 (32page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2021.08.136.93

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

This study investigated the important issues surrounding the curriculum of Korean Contemporary History, which are raised in discussion of democratic citizenship education in the academia of history education. In the primary and secondary education, the April 19 Revolution, 5·18 Democratization Movement, and June Democratization Movement repeatedly appeared, because the curriculum of Korean Contemporary History is grounded in the framework of national development based on the Constitution. In the discussion of democratic citizenship education, it is argued that Korean Contemporary History has to address the period after 1987 more prominently; history classes based on controversy should be encouraged; and history education needs to actively respond to “historical negation.” In learning Korean Contemporary History, however, students have to have opportunities to think of diverse and multilayered aspects of people’s lives, rather than simply focusing on national political history and developmental narratives. History education should stress ontological values of human beings and contribute to reflecting critically on myself and the community. At this point, Korean Contemporary history needs not be emphasized more than other time periods and regions. In order to go beyond a single narrative structure in teaching Korean history, autonomy for constructing history curriculum, particularly teachers’ autonomy, should be expanded. Also, the policy for mandatory Korean History in the College Scholastic Ability Test should be abolished.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. 1. 문제제기
  2. 2. 한국 현대사 교육과정 현황과 문제점
  3. 3. 현대사 교육을 강화해야 하는 이유?
  4. 4. 새롭게 배우는 현대사
  5. 5. 학생들이 책임질 미래와 인문학(자) 자성
  6. 참고문헌

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기