인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of high- and low-frequency rTMS on the recovery of upper extremity function in acute stroke patients. This study was designed as a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial. Experimental subjects were randomly divided into 10 Hz rTMS group (high frequency) and 1Hz group (low frequency). All subjects received 10 stimulation sessions, 5 days a week for 2 weeks. In the high frequency group (N=12), 10Hz rTMS was applied to the M1 area on the side of the brain lesion. The control group (N=13) applied 1Hz rTMS to the same brain area as the high-frequency group. In this study, the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) was used to evaluate independence in activities of daily living in stroke patients. To evaluate upper limb motor function, Fugl-Meyer motor assessment (FMA-UE) and Manual Function Test (MFT) were used. All subjects had motor function assessed before and 2 weeks after rTMS. There was no significant difference before and after intervention in both the high-frequency and low-frequency groups (p > 0.05). In the comparison between the two groups, there was no significant difference in all variables after the intervention (p > 0.05). There is still controversy as to whether high-frequency stimulation of the lesional M1 or low-frequency stimulation of the contralesional M1 is effective for stroke patients with mild and moderate functional impairment.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
