인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2025.12
- 수록면
- 389 - 419 (31page)
- DOI
- 10.24987/SNUACAR.2025.12.15.3.389
이용수
초록· 키워드
This article compares how youth disillusionment has unfolded in China and South Korea between 2010 and 2025 and explains why coping patterns diverge across these contrasting political contexts. Drawing on stress- coping theory, social movement framing, and political opportunity structures, we conceptualize youth responses as adaptive repertoires that range from passive withdrawal to collective contention. Using existing literature and survey data, we show that shared drivers―slowing growth, precarious employment, entrenched inequality, and intensifying performance pressures―have strained many young people’s confidence in institutions and produced parallel vernaculars of malaise (e.g., tǎngpíng / “let it rot” and “Hell Joseon”). When opportunities for voice are perceived as limited, Chinese youth tend to adopt individualized, low-risk strategies such as quiet quitting, online irony, internal exits, punctuated only occasionally by brief episodes of public expression and met with a combination of narrative steering, selective accommodation, and efforts to preserve social order control. In South Korea’s more pluralistic public arena, similar grievances more readily translate into digitally enabled mobilization, issue-specific protests, and partial institutional uptake, even as polarization (notably along gender lines) and persistent “exit” aspirations endure. The findings illuminate how structure conditions agency and suggest several potential policy priorities: credible pathways to quality jobs and housing, inclusive participation channels, and depolarizing frames that restore a generational stake in the future.
#Youth disillusionment
#Stress-coping theory
#Framing processes
#Political opportunity structures
#China-South Korea comparative study
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. Introduction
- Ⅱ. Youth Crisis
- Ⅲ. Theoretical Lenses
- Ⅳ. Youth Coping Mechanisms and Public Responses
- Ⅴ. Conclusion
- References
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
