인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
Tenant opposability refers to the legal right that enables a tenant to assert both the duration of tenancy and the return of a security deposit, even against a subsequent property owner. Traditionally, tenant opposability has been viewed as a mechanism that promotes housing stability. However, in the housing auction market, the existence of tenant opposability may result in longer auction periods before a successful bid is secured and lower bid price ratios. In addition, whether a tenant holding this right files a claim for dividend distribution and whether the security deposit is fully reimbursed through the distribution process can significantly affect both auction duration and bid price ratios. Accordingly, this study comprehensively examined the effects of tenant opposability on auction outcomes and bid price ratios. The analysis considered not only the existence of opposability but also whether the tenant filed a claim for dividend distribution and whether the successful bidder assumed tenant-related obligations. The results indicate that the mere existence of tenant opposability negatively affected both auction duration and bid price ratios. In contrast, the effect was positive when a tenant with opposability filed a dividend claim and received full reimbursement of the security deposit. However, the effect remained negative when the tenant did not file a dividend claim or when a claim was filed but the security deposit was not fully reimbursed. These findings suggest that the impact of tenant opposability varies considerably depending on whether the tenant files a claim for distribution and whether the security deposit is fully reimbursed through that process. When a tenant is unable to recover the security deposit despite possessing this right, the role of tenant opposability as a safeguard for housing stability is weakened. The Special Act on Jeonse Fraud Victims also has gaps in addressing these specific circumstances, highlighting the need for legislative amendments. Furthermore, an evaluation system should be established to assess the difficulty of recovering security deposits, whether through the distribution process or from the successful bidder.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
