메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Myung-Kwan Park (Dongguk University) Euiyon Cho (Dongguk University) Wonil Chung (Dongguk University)
저널정보
한국언어학회 언어 언어 제42권 제4호
발행연도
2017.12
수록면
663 - 690 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper used the neuro-linguistic, event-related potential (ERP) experimental methodology to investigate the sentence processing of the two negative polarity items (NPIs) in Korean such as amwu+N+to ‘any + N’ and te isang ‘any longer/further.’Our starting point is the descriptive and theoretical analyses of the two NPIs at issue. They are established as NPIs that require a licensing element for their distribution within a sentence, but they differ in terms of the type of licensing elements. Manipulating the structural environments, we recorded the neural responses to the verbal complexes that can or cannot license the NPIs. We found that, first, N400 was evoked by both of the NPIs in the illegal environments like a positive clause. Since N400 is regarded as a neural index of incomplete semantic integration, it follows that the Korean NPIs’ licensee-licensor relation is resolved via semantic processes. Second, amwu+N+to–containing question and -ki cen-ey ‘before’clauses as well as positive clauses elicited N400, whereas te isang–containing question and -ki cen-ey ‘before’ clauses elicited anterior P600. We take the latter anterior P600 component to reflect not a violation of NPI licensing but a cognitive load of discourse/pragmatic processing due to the lexical meaning of te isang. Third, directly comparing the two NPIs in terms of neural profiles, we find that amwu+N+to undergoes a full gamut of semantic retrieval and integration, thus cognitively more demanding than te isang in the course of their processing.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Experiment
3. Discussion and Conclusion
Reference

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-701-001679388