지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyse whether Article 63-2 of the National Pension Act, which authorizes the administration to decide on the reduction of pension payments for pensioners engaged in income activities, is constitutional. In this paper, it raises the question of whether Article 63-2 of the National Pension Act conforms to the principle of parliamentary reservation based on the Constitution. For this purpose, we use the literature research method which analyzes using the laws related to the subject, the precedents of the Constitutional Court, and the secondary literature. The research results are as follows. Article 63-2 of the National Pension Act entrusts the administration with the power to determine the level of income that is the criterion for reducing pensions that are related to the realization of essential basic rights such as property rights and freedom, which violates the principle of parliamentary reservation. This violates the Constitution by violating the basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
At the same time, the National Pension Act entrusts the executive with the authority to determine income levels without specific purpose, content, or limitation of delegation, which is contrary to the Constitution, which prohibits comprehensive delegation. In contrast, the current Military Pension Act and the Public Officials Pension Act, through the revision of the law in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s unconstitutional ruling, regulate the level of income in the law, which is the standard for pension cuts for pensioners engaged in income activities. Therefore, the applicable provisions of the National Pension Act should be amended in the form of direct discipline in the law, as in the Military Pension Act and the Public Officials Pension Act.
At the same time, the National Pension Act entrusts the executive with the authority to determine income levels without specific purpose, content, or limitation of delegation, which is contrary to the Constitution, which prohibits comprehensive delegation. In contrast, the current Military Pension Act and the Public Officials Pension Act, through the revision of the law in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s unconstitutional ruling, regulate the level of income in the law, which is the standard for pension cuts for pensioners engaged in income activities. Therefore, the applicable provisions of the National Pension Act should be amended in the form of direct discipline in the law, as in the Military Pension Act and the Public Officials Pension Act.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
Ⅱ. The Principle of Parliamentary Reservation and the Limitation of Delegated Legislation
Ⅲ. OLD AGE PENSION REDUCTION SYSTEM BASED ON INCOME ACTIVITIES
Ⅳ. CONCLUSION
References
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
Bundesverfassungsgericht / 1972 / Absoluter Numerus Clausus fuer Medizinstudium / BVerfGE 33:303~358
Bundesverfassungsgericht / 1973 / Regelung des Fachartztwesens durch Satzungen der Aerztenkammern / BVerfGE 33:125~171
Bundesverfassungsgericht / 1982 / Vorbehalt des Gesetzes fuer Regelungen ueber Entlassung eines Schuelers aus der Schule wegen unzureichender Leistungen / BVerGE 58:257~283
Constitutional Court / 2003 / Article 21 Paragraph 5 Subparagraph 2 of the Military Pension Unconstitutional Application(No. 2001헌가22) / Law Reports 15(2):231~253
Constitutional Court / 2003 / Article 47 No. 3 of the Public Officials Pension Act Unconstitutional Petition(No. 2000헌바94), Article 47 No. 2 of the Public Officials Pension Act unconstitutional application(No. 2001헌가21) / Law Reports 15(2):254~272
Bundesverfassungsgericht / 1973 / Regelung des Fachartztwesens durch Satzungen der Aerztenkammern / BVerfGE 33:125~171
Bundesverfassungsgericht / 1982 / Vorbehalt des Gesetzes fuer Regelungen ueber Entlassung eines Schuelers aus der Schule wegen unzureichender Leistungen / BVerGE 58:257~283
Constitutional Court / 2003 / Article 21 Paragraph 5 Subparagraph 2 of the Military Pension Unconstitutional Application(No. 2001헌가22) / Law Reports 15(2):231~253
Constitutional Court / 2003 / Article 47 No. 3 of the Public Officials Pension Act Unconstitutional Petition(No. 2000헌바94), Article 47 No. 2 of the Public Officials Pension Act unconstitutional application(No. 2001헌가21) / Law Reports 15(2):254~272
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Women’s Pension Rights in the Korean National Pension and the Japanese Public Pension
한일경상논집
2021 .01
-
연금 연구의 성과와 과제
리스크 관리연구
2019 .01
-
한국 공적연금 제도발전을 위한 영향요인 분석: 기본소득연금을 중심으로
한국비교정부학보
2021 .09
-
A Study on Issues and Plans in the Integration of Public Pensions
한국비교정부학보
2019 .01
-
한국과 미국의 사적연금자산 수요에 관한 비교연구
경영과학
2015 .09
-
연금수급권 강화 방안의 노후소득보장 효과 분석: 청년층을 중심으로
경기연구원 기본연구
2021 .08
-
공적연금제도 종류별 형평성 분석과 연금개혁에 대한 정책적 시사점: 국민연금과 공무원연금을 중심으로
보험금융연구
2021 .11
-
전후 베이비붐 세대의 국민연금에 관한 인식도 조사연구 : 대전광역시를 중심으로
사회적경제와 정책연구
2018 .10
-
Effect of Pensions on the Capital Market
리스크 관리연구
2022 .03
-
Public Pension and Basic Pension as Measures against Poverty for Elderly Women in Korea and Germany
한일경상논집
2024 .05
-
Strengthening Pension Fund Governance and Management in Egypt: Implications from the Korean Experience
중동문제연구
2015 .12
-
OECD와 한국 공적연금 : 소득대체율의 숨겨진 이야기
비판사회정책
2024 .08
-
국민연금 장애연금 수급자 생명표 개발에 대한 연구
한국무역경영연구
2021 .10
-
군인연금의 제도적인 개선방안에 관한 연구
경영교육연구
2018 .02
-
우리나라 공적연금의 보편적 중층보장체계로의 재구축 방안에 관한 연구
사회보장연구
2016 .01
-
한국 공사연금제도 협력을 위한 정보인프라 구축 방향
분석과 대안
2018 .01
-
연금저축 세제혜택 세액공제 전환에 따른 연금저축 납입행태 변화 분석
보험금융연구
2018 .01
-
한국과 일본의 분할연금제도 비교
일본연구
2021 .08
-
연금 추계 모형을 이용한 공무원연금제도 분석-일반직 공무원을 중심으로
아태비즈니스연구
2024 .09
-
해외사례 및 수요조사를 통한 공적연금보고서 개선방안
회계정보연구
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-350-000359372