지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There is no one who has the problematic characteristics in GaeHwa period's novelist than Lee In Gik. His novel [Teas of Blood] has been evaluated as the narrative which assists the colonization of Choseon, and which reflects the oppressive aspect of the modern and the problem of the political unconscious. I intend to read this novel in two ways. First, I will see this novel as the colonial discourse. Second, I will discuss this novel's narrative characteristics.
First, [Tears of Blood] shows the unfortunate destiny of one woman during about ten years, and the new consciousness about marriage. In addition to, this novel reveals the consciousness which opposes to the feudal system. However, we must notice that this novel defends the dicourse of solidarity between East Asian countries very positively, which is changed in quality to the colonial discourse. If we overlook this point, we can't explain the modern novel's characteristics that has close relationship with the colonialism [Tears of Blood] is evaluated as the one of our modern novel's origin. But we must not overlook that this novel made statement that period's political discourse, the solidarity between East Asian countries. Of course the substance of this political discourse is colonial. The discourse of solidarity between East Asian countries, which had been deployed from late in the 19th century, has the problem Because that opinion projects the joint with the imperial Japan without agony about the birth of nation-state. The discourse of solidarity between East Asian countries implies the contributes that rationalize the colonization of Choseon, even though the contents differ from each massmedia. To be regret, the intellectuals at that time who discussed the solidarity between East-Asian countries couldn't recognize that their thinking was able to rationalize the logic of imperial Japan.
Second, I intend to observe about writer's binary oppositional thinking which is represented imaginatively in [Tears of Blood], That is, he looked Choseon as the Other, the colony which had to be managed, and both Japan and America as the Subject, the origin of civilization which raised the colonial people. The narrative characteristics of Lee In Gik's work is based on the binary oppositional thought which divides the world with the empire and the outside. That is, this novel expresses coherently the relationship between empire and Choseon corresponds to the relationship between the center and the border, and the 'difference' between them can't be sealed.
First, [Tears of Blood] shows the unfortunate destiny of one woman during about ten years, and the new consciousness about marriage. In addition to, this novel reveals the consciousness which opposes to the feudal system. However, we must notice that this novel defends the dicourse of solidarity between East Asian countries very positively, which is changed in quality to the colonial discourse. If we overlook this point, we can't explain the modern novel's characteristics that has close relationship with the colonialism [Tears of Blood] is evaluated as the one of our modern novel's origin. But we must not overlook that this novel made statement that period's political discourse, the solidarity between East Asian countries. Of course the substance of this political discourse is colonial. The discourse of solidarity between East Asian countries, which had been deployed from late in the 19th century, has the problem Because that opinion projects the joint with the imperial Japan without agony about the birth of nation-state. The discourse of solidarity between East Asian countries implies the contributes that rationalize the colonization of Choseon, even though the contents differ from each massmedia. To be regret, the intellectuals at that time who discussed the solidarity between East-Asian countries couldn't recognize that their thinking was able to rationalize the logic of imperial Japan.
Second, I intend to observe about writer's binary oppositional thinking which is represented imaginatively in [Tears of Blood], That is, he looked Choseon as the Other, the colony which had to be managed, and both Japan and America as the Subject, the origin of civilization which raised the colonial people. The narrative characteristics of Lee In Gik's work is based on the binary oppositional thought which divides the world with the empire and the outside. That is, this novel expresses coherently the relationship between empire and Choseon corresponds to the relationship between the center and the border, and the 'difference' between them can't be sealed.
목차
1. 왜 이인직의 「혈의 누」인가?
2. 「혈의 누」: 식민 담론의 소설화
3. 「혈의 누」의 서사적 특징: 이항 대립의 구조화
4. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동아시아 역사상, 그 구축의 방식과 윤곽
역사학보
2008 .12
-
한국학계의 동아시아 만들기
역사와 세계
1999 .06
-
[DEBATE on Asian Values (4)] “Asian Values” and Confucian Discourse
Korea Journal
2001 .09
-
민족문학, 제3세계, 동아시아 - 최원식의 동아시아론의 계보와 구조
동방학지
2020 .01
-
‘동아시아사로서의 한국사’를 보는 방법 : 제국과 근대국가 그리고 지역
동북아역사논총
2013 .06
-
한반도 통일과 동아시아 지역연대
통일인문학
2016 .03
-
현행 〈동아시아사〉 교과서의 불교사 서술의 문제점과 개선 방안
역사교육
2019 .09
-
동아시아 연대와 가톨릭교회
신학전망
2017 .03
-
The “Korea Problem” : Moritani Katsumi and the East Asian Community in Colonial Korea, 1931-1945
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2016 .06
-
동아시아 담론의 문화적 의미
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1998 .03
-
동아시아 국가에서 세계화와 타자의식
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2002 .06
-
만주국 시기 조선인 이민담론의 시론적 고찰 : 조선일보 사설을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .03
-
동아시아 공동체의 가능성과 시민사회
사회와 철학
2006 .04
-
동아시아적 관점에서 생각하기
역사비평
2014 .11
-
지구사적 관점으로 본 동아시아사의 방법과 서술 : 인도양 연구에 대한 비판적 고찰을 토대로
동북아역사논총
2013 .06
-
世界史 敎科書 敍述에서 東아시아史 談論의 問題 : 中國 世界史 敎科書의 境遇
역사교육
2002 .12
-
1910년대 이광수 단편소설의 '정'의 양가성 연구
어문학
2005 .09
-
Discourse Functions of New-this
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2004 .04
-
1930년대 ‘피[血]’의 담론과 일본어 소설
우리말글
2011 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-013753383