메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
전남대학교 5.18연구소 민주주의와 인권 민주주의와 인권 제1권 2호
발행연도
2001.10
수록면
247 - 291 (45page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The political transformation of 1932, as of constitutional revolution marked another step away from traditional system. As the absolute monarchy was overthrown, traditional sakdina system was abolished, and political soverigns which could come out from subjects position were given to the people. The 1932 event was a big project whose promoter intended to supply protective mechanisms via the transition from pre-modern Pho-khun model (paternalist rule) to rule of law But the idea of 1932 revolution began to fade away because of conservative reaction and weak citizen consciousness. After all bureaucraic polity, as characterized by that state reignes over society, started to consolidate. Sarit regime winch entered the political stage via 1958 coup borrowed the traditional Pho-khun model. Sarit regime, as of developmental dictatorship, abrogated the political parties. But developmental dictatorship was collapsed owing to unintended outcomes of its developmental policies. During the upsurge of student radicalism and liberal politics between 1973 and 1976, especially in the atmosphere of extreme political polarization inn 1975~6, conservative forces branded any liberal dissident ideas as communist. It was not long before bureaucratic polity was transformed from the early 1980s. The growth of civil society opened civil premier period. But democratization was accompanied by capitalist rise in political sphere. Although another coup happened, civil society did not concede the political comeback of military. Military returned the barracks. Immediately social forces who initiated redemocratization demanded newly constitution-building which could fundamentally tarnsform bureaucratic polity, as a modem version of Pho-khun model. At this time for the fundamental change they need to tarnsform not only conventional institution but also chentelism embedded in tradition. The currend issues is how to reform the conventional institution and culture which was originated from 'thammaraja', and build 'tharnmarat' as a good governance.

목차

1. 문제의 제기

2. 전통의 정치와 보수적 개혁

3. 근대의 정치와 개혁의 이중성

4. 전환의 정치와 전통의 변형

5. 결론

참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-340-013784609