지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As an alternative, arbitration has become very popular in the world. Arbitration is faster and less expensive than litigation in the courts. Judicial systems do not allow the parties to a dispute to choose their own judges. In contrast, arbitration offers the parties the unique opportunity to designate persons of their choice as arbitrators, provided they are independent. This enables the parties to have their disputes resolved by people who have specialized competence in the relevant field
An arbitration agreement could be an arbitration clause stipulated by the parties in their contract or a separate written agreement concluded by the parties to submit their dispute for arbitration. The arbitration agreement may be reached prior to or after the occurrence of disputes.
According to Article 16 of the Arbitration Law of PRC., a valid arbitration agreement. must contain the following 3 elements: (i) the intention to submit the dispute for arbitration; (ii) the matters for arbitration; (iii) the arbitration institute.
China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) independently and impartially resolves, by means of arbitration, disputes arising from economic and trade transactions, contractual or non-contractual. As from October 1, 2000, CIETAC broadens its scope of jurisdiction to take cognizance of cases of different natures, whether international or domestic.
CIETAC takes cognizance of a case in accordance with an arbitration agreement reached by the parties to refer their dispute to CIETAC for arbitration and upon the written application by one of the parties.
Model arbitration clause recommended by ClETAC Any dispute arising from or in connection with this contract shall be submitted to China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission for arbitration which shall be conducted .in accordance with the Commission's arbitration rules in effect at the time of applying for .arbitration. The arbitral award is final and binding upon both parties.
"1958 New York Convention" became effective in China on April 22, 1987, which facilitates enforcement of CIETAC's awards in all contracting states.
A<?cording to Chinese law, if one party fails to comply with a CIETAC's award, the other party may apply for its enforcement to the intermediate people's court of the place where the party against whom the application for enforcement is made has his domicile or where his property is located.
An arbitration agreement could be an arbitration clause stipulated by the parties in their contract or a separate written agreement concluded by the parties to submit their dispute for arbitration. The arbitration agreement may be reached prior to or after the occurrence of disputes.
According to Article 16 of the Arbitration Law of PRC., a valid arbitration agreement. must contain the following 3 elements: (i) the intention to submit the dispute for arbitration; (ii) the matters for arbitration; (iii) the arbitration institute.
China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) independently and impartially resolves, by means of arbitration, disputes arising from economic and trade transactions, contractual or non-contractual. As from October 1, 2000, CIETAC broadens its scope of jurisdiction to take cognizance of cases of different natures, whether international or domestic.
CIETAC takes cognizance of a case in accordance with an arbitration agreement reached by the parties to refer their dispute to CIETAC for arbitration and upon the written application by one of the parties.
Model arbitration clause recommended by ClETAC Any dispute arising from or in connection with this contract shall be submitted to China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission for arbitration which shall be conducted .in accordance with the Commission's arbitration rules in effect at the time of applying for .arbitration. The arbitral award is final and binding upon both parties.
"1958 New York Convention" became effective in China on April 22, 1987, which facilitates enforcement of CIETAC's awards in all contracting states.
A<?cording to Chinese law, if one party fails to comply with a CIETAC's award, the other party may apply for its enforcement to the intermediate people's court of the place where the party against whom the application for enforcement is made has his domicile or where his property is located.
목차
1. 머리에
2. 중재계약의 의의
3. 중재계약의 형식
4. 중재계약의 내용
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중재합의시 중재지 결정에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2010 .12
-
중재계약의 법적 효력에 관한 연구
중재연구
2009 .01
-
중국의 온라인중재 운용과 법적문제에 관한 연구 - CIETAC의 온라인중재를 중심으로
중재연구
2010 .01
-
중재에 있어서 법원의 역할
무역상무연구
2006 .05
-
Arbitration of Sino-Korean Commercial Disputes
국제사법연구
2007 .12
-
중재계약의 준거법 적용에 관한 연구
문화산업연구
2004 .06
-
국제상사중재합의의 요건과 내용에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2007 .08
-
중재합의에 대한 새로운 고찰
중재연구
2013 .01
-
국제투자계약상의 중재조항(Arbitration Clause)의 주요 구성요소에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2008 .05
-
몽골 중재제도의 주요특징과 유의사항에 관한 연구
중재연구
2013 .01
-
중국 투자기업의 중국 국내중재기구이용 가능성에 관한 연구
중재연구
2014 .01
-
중재제도의 활성화를 위한 연구
원광법학
2010 .01
-
북한의 중재법의 주요 특징과 시사점
중재연구
2007 .01
-
중국에서의 국제상사중재합의 유효성에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2011 .05
-
건설중재에 있어서 선택적중재합의의 유효성에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2005 .02
-
중국국제경제무역중재위원회(CIETAC)의 운영시스템과 「국제투자분쟁중재규칙(试行)」에 관한 고찰
동북아법연구
2019 .01
-
한국중재의 영역확대 방안에 관한연구
중재연구
2010 .01
-
국제상사중재에 있어서 중재지의 의미
중재연구
2008 .01
-
중국 중재제도의 특성에 관한 사례 연구
무역학회지
2004 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
중재합의의 실질적 유효성의 법률적용문제 : 중국법원의 판례를 중심으로
오원석
,
이홍숙
무역학회지
2014
.06
선택적 중재합의의 유효성에 관한 법적 연구
김순이
동아법학
2012
.08
중재인선정 절차에 있어서의 당사자자치와 법원의 개입
오창석
법학연구
2016
.12
남중국해 중재사건의 관할권 판정 : 유엔해양법협약 제15부 분쟁해결 제도의 남용인가 진화인가?
김원희
서울국제법연구
2016
.06
중국의 중재절차상 임시적 처분에 관한 연구
이정선
,
성성
Asia-Pacific Journal of Business & Commerce
2015
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-014048668