인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
One of the key features of the 2002 presidential election was the emergence of generational politics, Young voters supported Roh Moo-hyun, the candidate of the ruling Millenium Democratic Party(MDP), whereas older voters favored Lee Hoi-chang, the candidate of the opposition Grand National Party(GNP). According to recent studies, differing political ideologies by generation was the main reason why generation became a significant factor for candidate choice in the last election. The younger generation favored the progressive candidate Roh because they were more progressive, and the older generation supported Lee because they were more conservative, In other words, generational cleavage has overlapped with ideological cleavage,
This article addresses the following two questions, First, how and to what extent did generation overlap with political ideology in candidate choice of the last presidential election, We measure the polarization ratio of political ideology by generation, by utilizing Yule's Q as a statistical indicator. Findings from this analysis show that generation strongly overlapped with ideological position in candidate choice. Hence, we argue that differing political preference by generation as well as ideology can be labelled as . generation-ideology cleavage' .
Second, we discuss the political consequences of emerging generational politics. In particular, this article examines whether the emergence of generational politics would undermine regionalism as an obstinate obstacle in Korean electoral politics. To do so we focus on the electorates of Cholla and Kyungsang provinces and compare voting behaviors of the three groups which belong to differing generation-ideology categories. The major findings of this analysis are mixed. Younger, progressive voters of the Kyungsang province show a lower intensity of regionalist voting than older, conservative voters. This clearly indicates that the emergence of generation-ideology cleavage would undermine regionalism in the Kyungsang province. By contrast, Cholla voters do not show a clear difference of candidate choice between younger, progressive and older, conservative groups, and maintain a higher intensity of regionalist voting. These findings do not allow us to predict that the emergence of generational politics will weaken regionalism. However, since we find out that generational cleavage is closely related with ideological cleavage, we need to pay close attention to the political consequences of generation-ideology cleavage.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지This article addresses the following two questions, First, how and to what extent did generation overlap with political ideology in candidate choice of the last presidential election, We measure the polarization ratio of political ideology by generation, by utilizing Yule's Q as a statistical indicator. Findings from this analysis show that generation strongly overlapped with ideological position in candidate choice. Hence, we argue that differing political preference by generation as well as ideology can be labelled as . generation-ideology cleavage' .
Second, we discuss the political consequences of emerging generational politics. In particular, this article examines whether the emergence of generational politics would undermine regionalism as an obstinate obstacle in Korean electoral politics. To do so we focus on the electorates of Cholla and Kyungsang provinces and compare voting behaviors of the three groups which belong to differing generation-ideology categories. The major findings of this analysis are mixed. Younger, progressive voters of the Kyungsang province show a lower intensity of regionalist voting than older, conservative voters. This clearly indicates that the emergence of generation-ideology cleavage would undermine regionalism in the Kyungsang province. By contrast, Cholla voters do not show a clear difference of candidate choice between younger, progressive and older, conservative groups, and maintain a higher intensity of regionalist voting. These findings do not allow us to predict that the emergence of generational politics will weaken regionalism. However, since we find out that generational cleavage is closely related with ideological cleavage, we need to pay close attention to the political consequences of generation-ideology cleavage.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 서론
- 2. 세대-이념균열의 등장
- 3. 세대-이념균열과 지역균열과의 관계
- 4. 결론
- 참고문헌
- 부록
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-014111566
