메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교법학회 비교법학연구 비교법학연구 제6집
발행연도
2005.9
수록면
21 - 58 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Where the subject-matter of a sale is subject to a superficies, servitude, registered lease, right of retention, or pledge and the buyer was unaware there of, the buyer may rescind the contract only if the objective of the contract is not unattainable thereby. In other case the buyer may only claim damages. If any defects exist in the subject-matter of a sale, the buyer may rescind the contract. However, if the buyer was aware of or was not aware due to his negligence of any defects, this shall not apply.
If the seller was unaware at the time the contract was made that the right which has been made he object of a sale did not belong to him, and the seller is unable, by acquiring the right he has sold, to transfer the right to the buyer, the seller may, paying damages suffered by the buyer, rescind the contract. Even where the subject-matter of a sale has been specified in kind, if there exist any defects in the specified subject-matter, the buyer, rescind the contract. The buyer rights mentioned in the preceding, seller's liability for warranty against defect and sale in kind and the seller’s liability for warranty are shall be exercised by the buyer within six months from the time when he was aware such fact.
The seller's liability for warranty against defect is an obliger fails to effect performance in accordance with the tenor and purport of the obligation, the obligee may claim damages, but this shall not apply to cases where performance has become impossible and this is not due to the obligor’s intention or fault. And the compensation for damages arising from the non-performance of an obligation shall be limited to ordinary damages. The obliger is responsible for reparation for damages that have arisen through special circumstances, only if he had foreseen or could have foreseen such circumstances. According to a change in the recently social environment, the seller’s liability for warranty against defect is demand for revision.

목차

Ⅰ. 序論

Ⅱ. 瑕疵擔保責任의 本質에 관한 學說

Ⅲ. 瑕疵擔保責任의 本質에 관한 判例의 動向

Ⅳ. 瑕疵擔保責任의 損害賠償의 새로운 摸索

Ⅴ. 結論

參考文獻

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)

  • 대법원 1979. 6. 26. 선고 79다564 판결

    타인의 권리매매에 있어 매도인의 목적물을 매수인에게 이전할 수 없게 된 것이 오직 매수인의 귀책사유에 기인한 경우에는 매도인은 민법 제569조 하자담보책임을 지지 않는다.

    자세히 보기

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-015296448