지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this proposal is to clarify the present policies in terms of current Cultural Properties Protection Act of Korean intangible heritage related to personal assets and to reform the Act with appropriate schemes.
1. Junsu-ja (who is in the training course) and Yisu-ja (Who has completed the training and is in the advanced training course)
a. It seems reasonable to set the total amount of training course for Junsu-ja as seven years. The seven-year-training course should be completed in an institutional education setting.
b. The limited age of being a Junsu-Ja, 18, should be adjusted and not against the stream.
c. Based on audition and the procedure of being instructed, Junsu-ja should be evaluated by at least seven members of committee. The opportunity to be acknowledged as Yisu-ja should be open to anyone who is qualified.
2. Junsu-assistance and relating problems
a. The total period of training course, the year of completion of the course, personal accomplishment, and artistic progression would be required to complete the training course.
b. Additionally the person who attained certification in regard of completion of training course and who has studied the advanced training course for ten years is qualifies to apply the audition.
c. If the number of Junsu-assistance increased, it would be effective in affirming the balanced development of cultural intangible assets.
3. Re-enforcement of vice-Boyuja (who has already acknowledged as a qualified artist to maintain certain portion of Korean Intangible Heritage)
a. A numbers of Junsu-assistances will benefit from re-operating the policy of vice-Boyuja by validating their social and artistic status. The policy will provide Junsu-assistances with advanced supportive system to improve their quality of art and to maintain overall high-mindedness level of Korean culture.
4. The procedure of acknowledgement of Boyu-ja and its procedure
a. It is important to retain the original form of itself. Therefore, the structure of origin needs to be accomplished.
b. It takes about ten to twenty years of period for any Yisu-ja to become a Boyu-ja in his / her specified field. At this point, about thirty years of long-term training period is suggested. It is believed that Boyu-ja, who is eligible and responsible for maintaining certain part of the national cultural properties, should have a minimum of thirty years of entire training period.
c. Personal Qualifications of a Boyu-ja, including a genuine talent in specified filed and desire to take over Korean culture, will be done by research committee consisted of five members.
5. The establishment of method for maintaining artistic qualification
a. It would be strongly recommended to require each of Junsu-ja and Yisu-ja to have a yearly recital, which is opened to public.
6. The policy for honorary cultural retainers
a. The policy of the honorary cultural retainers is also in need of improvement to maintain its own attribute and to affect the development of Korean intangible cultural properties.
1. Junsu-ja (who is in the training course) and Yisu-ja (Who has completed the training and is in the advanced training course)
a. It seems reasonable to set the total amount of training course for Junsu-ja as seven years. The seven-year-training course should be completed in an institutional education setting.
b. The limited age of being a Junsu-Ja, 18, should be adjusted and not against the stream.
c. Based on audition and the procedure of being instructed, Junsu-ja should be evaluated by at least seven members of committee. The opportunity to be acknowledged as Yisu-ja should be open to anyone who is qualified.
2. Junsu-assistance and relating problems
a. The total period of training course, the year of completion of the course, personal accomplishment, and artistic progression would be required to complete the training course.
b. Additionally the person who attained certification in regard of completion of training course and who has studied the advanced training course for ten years is qualifies to apply the audition.
c. If the number of Junsu-assistance increased, it would be effective in affirming the balanced development of cultural intangible assets.
3. Re-enforcement of vice-Boyuja (who has already acknowledged as a qualified artist to maintain certain portion of Korean Intangible Heritage)
a. A numbers of Junsu-assistances will benefit from re-operating the policy of vice-Boyuja by validating their social and artistic status. The policy will provide Junsu-assistances with advanced supportive system to improve their quality of art and to maintain overall high-mindedness level of Korean culture.
4. The procedure of acknowledgement of Boyu-ja and its procedure
a. It is important to retain the original form of itself. Therefore, the structure of origin needs to be accomplished.
b. It takes about ten to twenty years of period for any Yisu-ja to become a Boyu-ja in his / her specified field. At this point, about thirty years of long-term training period is suggested. It is believed that Boyu-ja, who is eligible and responsible for maintaining certain part of the national cultural properties, should have a minimum of thirty years of entire training period.
c. Personal Qualifications of a Boyu-ja, including a genuine talent in specified filed and desire to take over Korean culture, will be done by research committee consisted of five members.
5. The establishment of method for maintaining artistic qualification
a. It would be strongly recommended to require each of Junsu-ja and Yisu-ja to have a yearly recital, which is opened to public.
6. The policy for honorary cultural retainers
a. The policy of the honorary cultural retainers is also in need of improvement to maintain its own attribute and to affect the development of Korean intangible cultural properties.
목차
Ⅰ. 시작하며
Ⅱ. 전수자 및 이수자에 관한 문제
Ⅲ. 전수교육 조교와 관련된 문제
Ⅳ. 〈준 보유자〉의 제도를 환원하는 문제
Ⅴ. 보유자 인정기준 및 절차에 관한 문제
Ⅵ. 보유자 인정후의 제반 활동에 관한 문제
Ⅶ. 명예후보자에 관한 문제
Ⅷ. 나오며
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
자원 한자 교수-학습 연구
漢字漢文敎育
2006 .01
-
ja/JA의 담화기능에 관한 연구
언어과학연구
2002 .12
-
국어 담화 표지 '자'에 대한 연구
우리말글
2005 .08
-
시공의 재배치와 정박하지 못하는 젠더 -김기영의 <충녀>를 중심으로
인문논총
2011 .01
-
향상된 JA 방식을 이용한 다 모델 기반의 잡음음성인식에 대한 연구
음성과학
2006 .06
-
『이자수어(李子粹語)』 편찬에 나타난 성호의 퇴계학 계승의식
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2020 .03
-
Hye-ja"s Snow Flowers
Korea Journal
1993 .03
-
1990년대의 중요무형문화재 관리제도 개선과 그 문제점
한국민속학
2003 .06
-
무형문화재 제도의 문제점과 개선책 : 예능종목을 중심으로
비교문화연구
2002 .06
-
광역자치단체 무형문화재 제도의 연구 : 무용종목을 중심으로
한국민속학
2006 .12
-
무형문화재 관련 법률의 제 문제
비교민속학
2018 .12
-
荀子의 言語觀
우리말글
2013 .12
-
韓國 固有漢字 조사 연구 - 人名用 固有漢字를 중심으로 -
민족문화연구
2005 .01
-
전승교육과정의 실상과 문제점에 관한 일연구 : 공예·기술 분야를 중심으로
비교문화연구
2002 .12
-
임자지역의 사회ㆍ공간 구조
도서문화
2004 .12
-
데자뷔의 끝은 어디인가?
역사와현실
2016 .09
-
한ㆍ일 전통 공연예술의 유파 전승과 무형문화재 제도 비교연구 : 교겐과 판소리를 중심으로
비교민속학
2012 .12
-
한국 한문학의 用事와 知的 體系에 대한 연구
동방한문학
2018 .01
-
한국 여성 예술가의 작품에 나타난 개인서사와 감정에 관한 연구 - 천경자의 그림 속 ‘동물-되기’로 드러난 감정을 중심으로 -
양명학
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
중요무형문화재 보전 정책 개선 방안 연구
소병희
,
진혜영
문화정책논총
2012
.01
동아시아 무형문화유산 보호제도와 유네스코 협약
박계리
미술사논단
2012
.06
새로운 환경에 따른 무형문화재의 중요성과 가치 : 남사당놀이를 중심으로
구자순
한국문화산업학회 학술대회
2011
.06
무속 관련 무형문화재 제도의 의의와 한계 : 무속에 대한 시각을 중심으로
이용범
비교민속학
2011
.08
[전통문화] 21세기 한국문화, 새로운 모색이 필요하다(1) - 새 ‘무형문화유산법’ 제정을 위한 몇 가지 제안
서연호
공연과리뷰
2011
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-380-017641741