메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국미술사교육학회 미술사학 美術史學 第21號
발행연도
2007.8
수록면
375 - 408 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
From the Korea’s liberation of 45 years of Japanese colonial rule to the present analysts say there are still various practical problems in the history of Korean craft art in spite of remarkable achievement in couple of areas. Among those, putting undue stress on histories of ceramics and metal craft is considered the most urgent problem that needs improving in order to paint the whole picture of Korean art history as well as the reality of existing particulars but generals and to restore historical facts. The rest of the areas beyond ceramics and metal craft have been the subjects of study even less one time for the last 60 years of research. If left unchecked, the situation can be even worse including the possibility of diminishing research environment.
Along with the process of forming the art history, the climate of considering the ancient times as the period of classic, valuing it as an important subject of study and viewing comparatively the post- Joseon Dynasty period based on the ancient times shows the limitations influenced by Japan’s historical views thai lowered the stature of Joseon Dynasty so as to build the cause of its colonial rule. If the problems stem from the viewpoint of orientalism, there is no time to waste.
Above of all, establishing original paradigm in the history of Korean craft should be considered first, Comprehensive recognition of art should also be tried by nurturing the study areas focusing on materials, changing the single-track trend of studying the history of craft and engaging and communicating with related studies. This presumption cannot be denied as various aspects of the history of craft are closely interlinked. For this, it is cross joint and interests among detailed majors in the same areas as well as among genres in the history of art that are needed.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 60년 공예사 연구의 선택과 편향
Ⅲ. 문제의 성찰과 대안의 모색
Ⅳ. 맺음말
Abstract
「한국 공예사학의 장르관습과 위계구조」에 대한 질의
주경미 선생님의 질의에 대한 답변

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-650-017048329