지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
An application for separation from a spouse residing in North Korea was recently accepted by Seoul Family Court. Despite the many objections against deciding on North Korean marriages with South Korean laws, the issue of divorce proceedings for North Korean refugees is replete with many issues that need to be considered.
First, this contradict's South Korean constitution's stance on North Korea, which it considers an antinational organization. Marriages in North Korea cannot be dissolved by decisions of the courts, but rather if deemed null or as per a decision of his excellency. This can be considered a limitation of legislative resolution that does not comply with the entire normative system.
Second, there is the question of whether or not the North Korean spouse is a suitable as a defendant. The proceedings are held based on the testimony of the refugee, and it's difficult for the courts to determine the North Korean spouse's qualifications as a defendant.
Third is the question of whether or not the remote possibility of reuniting with the North Korean spouse holds water as a "serious cause against continued marriage."
Fourth is the issue of admissibility of evidence. For North Korean citizenship documents and death-and marriage-related submitted by the refugee in South Korean courts, there is no basis that such documents can have admissibility of evidence. This is because such recognition will in tern indirectly recognize the authority of North Korea's legal system.
Fifth is the issue of conveyance by public notice. At a time when traveling between North and South Korea is severely restrictive and the possibility of this changing in the near future seems remote, it's doubtful whether or not conveyance by public notice would be effective.
Ultimately legal disputes between North and South Korea will need to proceed in a private law format, from the normative symmetrical perspective.
First, this contradict's South Korean constitution's stance on North Korea, which it considers an antinational organization. Marriages in North Korea cannot be dissolved by decisions of the courts, but rather if deemed null or as per a decision of his excellency. This can be considered a limitation of legislative resolution that does not comply with the entire normative system.
Second, there is the question of whether or not the North Korean spouse is a suitable as a defendant. The proceedings are held based on the testimony of the refugee, and it's difficult for the courts to determine the North Korean spouse's qualifications as a defendant.
Third is the question of whether or not the remote possibility of reuniting with the North Korean spouse holds water as a "serious cause against continued marriage."
Fourth is the issue of admissibility of evidence. For North Korean citizenship documents and death-and marriage-related submitted by the refugee in South Korean courts, there is no basis that such documents can have admissibility of evidence. This is because such recognition will in tern indirectly recognize the authority of North Korea's legal system.
Fifth is the issue of conveyance by public notice. At a time when traveling between North and South Korea is severely restrictive and the possibility of this changing in the near future seems remote, it's doubtful whether or not conveyance by public notice would be effective.
Ultimately legal disputes between North and South Korea will need to proceed in a private law format, from the normative symmetrical perspective.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 북한이탈주민 이혼소송의 경과
Ⅲ. 북한이탈주민 이혼소송의 쟁점
Ⅳ. 결론
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
법이론과 법정책의 관점에서 접근한 새터민 이혼소송
통일정책연구
2008 .01
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
The North Korean Economy: Current Situation, Crisis, and Possible Scenarios
Asian International Studies Review
2006 .01
-
통일준비차원에서 북한주민의 법 인식 교정을 위한 지향점 도출 연구 : 사회주의법 및 북한법의 배경을 중심으로
한양법학
2016 .11
-
North Korean Negotiating Behavior : A Comparison of the North-South Korean and North Korea-United States Negotiations
한국국제정치학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .09
-
새터민을 위한 한국어 어휘 교육 방안
한국언어문화학
2011 .01
-
An Investigation into the Educational Experiences of North Korean Refugees in China in Light of Their Exposure to Human Rights Violations
Journal of Multicultural Society : OMNES
2017 .07
-
North-South Korean Relations in the Year 2000
아세아연구
1985 .07
-
South-North Korean Relations in the Year 2000
아세아연구
1985 .07
-
북한자료 공개제도 개선 방안 연구
현대북한연구
2009 .08
-
북한 주민의 외부 접촉과 대남 인식 변화
아세아연구
2014 .09
-
북한사회의 변화 전망과 대북 정책의 방향
경기연구원 기본연구
2009 .11
-
북한 사회 연구동향과 과제
현대북한연구
2010 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-016379379