메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第22卷 第3號
발행연도
2008.9
수록면
183 - 216 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the 1997 Foreign Exchange Crisis Korean government adopted to streamline the restrictive measures with respect to foreign investment to Korean stock market. With the increase of foreign investment to Korean stock market, Korean economy got over the crisis within short period of time. However, the deregulation of foreign investment caused some problems, such as bust-un M&A, rapid reduction of legal capital, excessive dividend over profit, and reverse discrimination of domestic corporation due to some articles of antitrust law.
This article suggests to abolish some discriminative measures of Korean antitrust law such as the restriction of total amount of investment among certain level of conglomerates. It also suggests the deregulation of pure holding companies, including the abolishment of the restriction of debt ratio. In order to protect national security interest and national infra-structure industries, this article proposes to amend some provisions of Korea Foreign Investment Promotion Act. It suggests to clarify the restrictive measures to foreign investment and the scope of foreign investment. It also analyzes the public tender offer system. In order to enhance the disclosure system of public tender offer, this article proposes to introduce mandatory disclosure of the opinion of target's management. The target company must be allowed to ask questions to the offeror if the offeror has appropriate future managernent plan and the offeror must answer the questions. This article also suggests to adopt the mandatory public tender offer in case the offeror acquires one thirds of the outstanding shares of the target company. However, it does not recommend to acquire mandatorily certain ratio of the outstanding shares.
Finally it analyzes the current status of the super majority voting policies under Korean Commercial Code(KCC). Even though it seems to be allowed through the interpretation of current KCC, it proposed to amend the KCC to clarify the issues.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 외국인의 주식투자 증가에 따른 문제 사례
Ⅲ. 공정거래법상 국내투자가에 대한 역차별 문제
Ⅳ. 국가안보 및 국가기간산업의 보호 문제
Ⅴ. 공개매수제도의 개선
Ⅵ. 적대적 M&A 대응방안으로서 초다수 결의요건의 부과
Ⅶ. 결어
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (58)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0