지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines how deliberative is the on-line political discussion on various issues related to the general election in 2000. Given that the internet has been diffused at a rapid rate in South Korea, and that not only political parties but also movement groups actively utilize their web-sites as instruments of political communication this study intends to develop a framework with which we can better understand the political implications of internet-based discussion or conversation for the development of deliberative democracy. A content analysis of bulletin board run by the Coalition of Movement Groups that announced a black list of corrupted politicians with substantial evidences, was conducted with a view to analyze the state of the art of the political online-discussion in South Korea.
Two research questions were raised. First, how the bulletin board has been used during the period of election campaign? This question was also followed by other related questions such as: who were the participants of one-line discussion, how often they participated, in what way they were engaged in political conversation, what types of writings were posted and so on.
The second question asks whether the online-discussion satisfied the various conditions for deliberation. As the conditions for deliberations, this study introduced notions such as interactivity, diversity of opinion, reliability and validation of argument. Highly interactive, freely exchanged, rationalistic discussion on diverse issues was seen as features of deliberation.
It was found that the bulletin board allowed many users to express freely their ideas as well as opinions. As compared other bulletin boards provided by other political web-sites, the Coalition's BBS was far more active in terms of number of postings and replies. The freedom of speaking was fully realized in the political cyberspace. This finding may be seen as satisfying some conditions of deliberation.
But it was also found that there exist a number of flamings as well as unreliable arguments. Anonymous users was found to be less hesitant in using abusive language. The BBS was used, in a sense, as a "battle field" among political supporters of candidates, in which personal attack against a particular candidate was followed by counter-attack against his or her competitors. Reply was followed specially when users mentioned either a candidate's name or his/her parties, which suggests that the BBS has been closely monitored by many campaign camps.
The empirical findings requires us to rethink about political implications of online-discussion. Despite that this case study shows a wider or higher degree of participation in online-discussion on political issues, universal participation was not guaranteed yet. Besides, the finding that very few political arguments has led to a compromise or negotiation suggests that the notion of public sphere or deliberative democracy can not be easily substantiated even in the context of cyberspace. Although we often hear optimistic messages that cyberspace will function as an alternative public sphere, a wide gap still exist between what can be done and what should be done.
It is, however, important to note that these findings not be generalized into other situations, due mainly to the bulletin board's specific nature in political and cultural context. For instance, if it is not about election which tend to be a zero-sum game between competitors, and if its participants are less anonymous and thus more responsible, we may have different results.
Two research questions were raised. First, how the bulletin board has been used during the period of election campaign? This question was also followed by other related questions such as: who were the participants of one-line discussion, how often they participated, in what way they were engaged in political conversation, what types of writings were posted and so on.
The second question asks whether the online-discussion satisfied the various conditions for deliberation. As the conditions for deliberations, this study introduced notions such as interactivity, diversity of opinion, reliability and validation of argument. Highly interactive, freely exchanged, rationalistic discussion on diverse issues was seen as features of deliberation.
It was found that the bulletin board allowed many users to express freely their ideas as well as opinions. As compared other bulletin boards provided by other political web-sites, the Coalition's BBS was far more active in terms of number of postings and replies. The freedom of speaking was fully realized in the political cyberspace. This finding may be seen as satisfying some conditions of deliberation.
But it was also found that there exist a number of flamings as well as unreliable arguments. Anonymous users was found to be less hesitant in using abusive language. The BBS was used, in a sense, as a "battle field" among political supporters of candidates, in which personal attack against a particular candidate was followed by counter-attack against his or her competitors. Reply was followed specially when users mentioned either a candidate's name or his/her parties, which suggests that the BBS has been closely monitored by many campaign camps.
The empirical findings requires us to rethink about political implications of online-discussion. Despite that this case study shows a wider or higher degree of participation in online-discussion on political issues, universal participation was not guaranteed yet. Besides, the finding that very few political arguments has led to a compromise or negotiation suggests that the notion of public sphere or deliberative democracy can not be easily substantiated even in the context of cyberspace. Although we often hear optimistic messages that cyberspace will function as an alternative public sphere, a wide gap still exist between what can be done and what should be done.
It is, however, important to note that these findings not be generalized into other situations, due mainly to the bulletin board's specific nature in political and cultural context. For instance, if it is not about election which tend to be a zero-sum game between competitors, and if its participants are less anonymous and thus more responsible, we may have different results.
목차
1. 문제제기
2. 이론적 논의
3. 연구문제
4. 연구방법
5. 분석결과
6. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
숙의민주주의와 가상공간내 정치토론
언론과 사회
2002 .02
-
사이버 공간에서의 정치 커뮤니케이션 양식 분석 연구 : 제16대 총선 후보자 사이버 게시판 분석을 중심으로
한국언론정보학보
2001 .05
-
Deliberative Democracy On-line : An Examination of Citizen Communications on an Internet Bulletin Board in Korea
정보사회와 미디어
2012 .12
-
Political Diversity and Participation: A Systematic Review of the Measurement and Relationship
Asian journal for public opinion research : AJPOR
2014 .01
-
INFLUENCE OF THE INTERNET ON POLITICAL ENGAGEMENTS THROUGH SOCIAL CAPITAL : US PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN OF 2000
한국정치학회보
2003 .11
-
‘숙의’와 ‘참여’의 공존 : 대화의 숙의수준에 따른 정치적 이견의 경험과 정치참여의 관계 탐색
한국언론학보
2009 .06
-
숙의민주주의를 위한 온라인 토론의 조건 : 평가지표를 적용한 온라인 토론 비교분석
사이버커뮤니케이션학보
2010 .06
-
컴퓨터 매개 정치의 패러독스 : 전자 민주주의와 한국사회 현실에 대한 비판적 검토
한국언론학보
2000 .09
-
전자게시판 토론 참여자의 토론 능력과 숙의적 토론과의 관계
언론정보연구
2007 .08
-
한국 제1공화국 정치문화의 특성
국제정치연구
2012 .12
-
The Present and Future of the History of Political Thought in Korea : between the West and the Past
국제정치연구
2014 .12
-
ปัจจัยที่มีผลต่อความอ่อนแอของพรรคการเมืองไทย
한국태국학회논총
2013 .01
-
인터넷 공간에서의 ‘여가화된 정치 토론’에 대한 연구 : 읽기/쓰기 및 공감 예측모델 분석
한국방송학보
2013 .05
-
인터넷 게시판 토론과 정치 토론 효능감
한국언론학보
2006 .06
-
당내민주주의의 헌법적 의의와 실현방안
원광법학
2013 .01
-
Third-Person Perception of User-Generated Online Political Messages and the Relationship with Government Regulation in South Korea
Asian Communication Research
2011 .12
-
태국 정당의 정치자금에 관한 연구
동남아시아연구
2004 .01
-
[일반논문] 전자적 공론장과 16대 대통령선거
아세아연구
2004 .03
-
태국의 최근 정치적 갈등: 그 평가와 전망
동남아연구
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
숙의민주주의를 위한 온라인 토론의 조건 : 평가지표를 적용한 온라인 토론 비교분석
윤영철
,
송현진
,
강기호
외 1명
사이버커뮤니케이션학보
2010
.06
사이버공론장의 분화와 숙의민주주의의 조건
김종길
한국사회학
2005
.04
숙의(deliberation) 관점에서 본 인터넷 토론 게시판과 글 분석 : 의견 조정성 예측을 위한 다수준모델(multi-level model) 검증
이종혁
,
최윤정
한국언론학보
2012
.04
한국행정의 주민참여 정책과정 연구 : 참여의 정도와 내용을 중심으로
정정화
,
은재호
,
남재걸
한국사회와 행정연구
2014
.02
인터넷 게시글의 숙의적 요인과 이념 일치성이 토론 참여자들의 평가에 미치는 영향 : 추천/비추천 예측모델 분석
이종혁
,
장기선
,
최윤정
한국방송학보
2013
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0