지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The silhak ideology of the late-Joseon dynasty is mainly known for its social reforms, which had a mix of nationalistic and modern-minded traits. The history of silhak is understood to have developed during the cross over from medieval ideals, a period of foreign invasions(l592-1598) which emphasized honor, tradition and social standing, to more modem ideals which emphasized practicality, objectivity, and empirical evidence. Silhak were avidly studied in the period after independence, especially in the 1950s. It is known as a field of study that left many discoveries and accomplishments in the fields of Korean History and Korean studies.
Early on I have studied the history of the commodities and monetary economy of practical scientists as a part of my research on the history of the late-Joseon dynasty′s monetary economy. Additionally, to have a more broad, objective understanding of the commodities and monetary economy of the silhakja(實學者), I have studied the monarchy, the high-level officials, and the rural scholars in detail. Furthermore, by chronologically organizing the accomplishment of many silhakja, I have been able to give a personal input on the creation, development, and defining of the silhak.
However there has always been something that doesn′t fail to escape my mind every time I write a paper on this topic. That is the view point that silhak should expand from the point of view of a few important scholars to a wider historical view point Moving our point of view to the historical perspective means answering the following questions. One, where was the first place that created and developed the silhak of the late-Joseon dynasty? Two, what were the developmental stages that the silhak had to go through that eventually led to our opening our borders to foreign nations? Have these historical positions been correctly appraised and recognized? Third, is it impossible to regulate the definition of silhak that embodies metaphysics, as it was done during the late-Goryeo and early-Joseon period? Reanalyzing these key factors seemed like the ideal way to have a deeper, better understanding of the creation, development, and historical stand point of the silhak.
When the point of view shifted to a historical perspective, the following facts were observed.
First, the area of study for the silhak expanded time-wise and space-wise. The period of establishment was traced back to early-Joseon, and the place of establishment was traced to Gaeseong(開城), the cultural center of the Goryeo dynasty which was outside of the Hanyang(漢陽) cultural realm.
Secondly, authorities who believed that the role and position of the silhak movement of late-Joseon to be relative to those of the few progressive silhakja are thought to have had more influence socially than previously thought. These authorities included 430 high-ranking officials from a community of scholars from Gaeseong who supported the advancement of the silhak.
Thirdly, the development of the silhak could be studied in three distinct stages. The first stage was the late-Goryeo and early-Joseon silhak, or ‘Ancient Silhak’. The second stage was the late-Joseon silhak, or ‘Medieval Silhak’. And the third stage was the silhak that need further studying, or ‘Modern Silhak’. Also a field of study that embodies all three of these eras, or ‘Korean Silhak’, can also be considered.
Finally, by comparing and studying the monetary economy theories of the silhakja and enlightenment scholars and that of the monarchy, high-ranking officials and rural scholars of the same period, a fuller, more detailed understanding of the development of the silhak of the late-Joseon currency economy and how these developments led to the open-door policy of the enlightenment era, could be achieved.
Early on I have studied the history of the commodities and monetary economy of practical scientists as a part of my research on the history of the late-Joseon dynasty′s monetary economy. Additionally, to have a more broad, objective understanding of the commodities and monetary economy of the silhakja(實學者), I have studied the monarchy, the high-level officials, and the rural scholars in detail. Furthermore, by chronologically organizing the accomplishment of many silhakja, I have been able to give a personal input on the creation, development, and defining of the silhak.
However there has always been something that doesn′t fail to escape my mind every time I write a paper on this topic. That is the view point that silhak should expand from the point of view of a few important scholars to a wider historical view point Moving our point of view to the historical perspective means answering the following questions. One, where was the first place that created and developed the silhak of the late-Joseon dynasty? Two, what were the developmental stages that the silhak had to go through that eventually led to our opening our borders to foreign nations? Have these historical positions been correctly appraised and recognized? Third, is it impossible to regulate the definition of silhak that embodies metaphysics, as it was done during the late-Goryeo and early-Joseon period? Reanalyzing these key factors seemed like the ideal way to have a deeper, better understanding of the creation, development, and historical stand point of the silhak.
When the point of view shifted to a historical perspective, the following facts were observed.
First, the area of study for the silhak expanded time-wise and space-wise. The period of establishment was traced back to early-Joseon, and the place of establishment was traced to Gaeseong(開城), the cultural center of the Goryeo dynasty which was outside of the Hanyang(漢陽) cultural realm.
Secondly, authorities who believed that the role and position of the silhak movement of late-Joseon to be relative to those of the few progressive silhakja are thought to have had more influence socially than previously thought. These authorities included 430 high-ranking officials from a community of scholars from Gaeseong who supported the advancement of the silhak.
Thirdly, the development of the silhak could be studied in three distinct stages. The first stage was the late-Goryeo and early-Joseon silhak, or ‘Ancient Silhak’. The second stage was the late-Joseon silhak, or ‘Medieval Silhak’. And the third stage was the silhak that need further studying, or ‘Modern Silhak’. Also a field of study that embodies all three of these eras, or ‘Korean Silhak’, can also be considered.
Finally, by comparing and studying the monetary economy theories of the silhakja and enlightenment scholars and that of the monarchy, high-ranking officials and rural scholars of the same period, a fuller, more detailed understanding of the development of the silhak of the late-Joseon currency economy and how these developments led to the open-door policy of the enlightenment era, could be achieved.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 실학요람으로서 개성의 위치
Ⅲ. 실학위치의 확대 인식
Ⅳ. 한국실학의 개념 모색
Ⅴ. 실학사상의 발전단계 : 화폐경제론을 중심으로
Ⅵ. 맺음말 : 실학 이해시각의 모색
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선후기 실학 연구의 추이와 성과 : 해방 후 한국에서의 실학 연구, 방법과 문제의식
한국사연구
2019 .03
-
실학 개념의 재정립 : 탐구의 학으로서의 실학
인간·환경·미래
2008 .12
-
最近의 實學硏究에 對하여
역사교육
1962 .06
-
근대 초기 실학의 존재론 : 실학 인식의 방향 전환을 위하여
역사비평
2018 .02
-
An Introduction to Silhak
Korea Journal
1975 .05
-
실학의 연구방법과 그 성과 및 전망
철학연구
1993 .06
-
실학의 연구방법과 그 성과 및 전망
철학연구
1993 .06
-
동아시아 교과서의 ‘실학’ 서술 : 2011 사회과 교육과정을 중심으로
역사와실학
2014 .11
-
한국의 실학 연구와 『東方學志』
동방학지
2010 .01
-
Disputes and Tasks in Research on the Thought of Silhak
Korea Journal
1982 .11
-
조선시대 ‘실학’ 개념에 대한 고찰
한국사학보
2019 .05
-
초등학교 사회 교과서의 ‘실학’ 서술
역사와실학
2014 .08
-
조선후기 문화와 실학
다산과 현대
2009 .12
-
한국 근대 민족주의의 발전과 實學
다산과 현대
2016 .12
-
조선후기 정치와 실학
다산과 현대
2009 .12
-
한국 근ㆍ현대 실학 연구의 추이와 그 문제의식
다산과 현대
2009 .12
-
朝鮮後期 實學者의 敎育思想 一考
역사교육
1979 .11
-
개념사와 내재적 발전 : ‘실학’ 개념을 중심으로
역사학보
2012 .03
-
朝鮮後期 實學者의 防禦體制改革論 : 연구현황 및 과제와 관련하여
역사와실학
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0