개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Woo Bong Kim family(牛峰金氏) was famous diplomats in the late Joseon Dynasty. Especially its fame had been spread out since Kim Ji-Nam(金指南), and there had been 95 diplomats in the family. They carried key roles in the relations with Ching(淸) and japan in the late of Joseon Dynasty.
Kim Ii-Nam had been to japan as a member of Tongsinsa in 1682 and then wrote Tongsaillok(『東?日錄』). And his son Kim Hyun-Moon(金顯門), also has been to Japan as a member of Tongsinsa in 1711, wrote Dongsalok (『東?錄』). These two books have important position between 4 Japan travel essays which were written by diplomats because of its accurate and abundant details. It is not too much to say that Kim Kun-Sea(金健瑞) was the specialist about Japanese society of the day who is the writer of Jeungjeongkyorinji(『增正交隣志』). So we can see that Kim Ji-Nam family left its footmarks as the great diplomats in the relations with Japan in the late period of Joseon Dynasty.
The members of Woo Bong Kim family had contributed to diplomatic system keeping on a good condition by not only diplomatic activities but also writings. It seems that Kim Kun-Seo could write a great book such as Jeungjeongkyorinji by succeeding his family traditions.
The summary of characteristics of Jeungjeongkyorinji is as follows.
First of all, it is abundant in contents. It was composed of 69 contents compared with 29 contents of Haedongjegukgi(『海東諸國記』) in the early of Joseon Dynasty and 36 contents of Tongmunkwanji(『通文館志』) in the late period of Joseon Dynasty.
Secondly, it shows well about the changes through 18-19th centuries from 17 centuries.
Thirdly, it is more focused on economics than Tongmunkwanji. For this point, Jeungjeongkyorinji is an important materials for not only use of business manuals about relations with Japan but also for research of Japanese economics.
Lastly, Jeungjeongkyorinji uses year-recording system based on the reign-style of King of Joseon, while Tongmunkwanji uses the Chinese way. Also it contains the contents about Eulreungdo(鬱陵島) and it shows the sensitive reaction against the territorial problems. It seems the expression of national consciousness motivated in the late of 18th century and also the result of Kim Kun-Seo’s self-consciousness.
Kim Ii-Nam had been to japan as a member of Tongsinsa in 1682 and then wrote Tongsaillok(『東?日錄』). And his son Kim Hyun-Moon(金顯門), also has been to Japan as a member of Tongsinsa in 1711, wrote Dongsalok (『東?錄』). These two books have important position between 4 Japan travel essays which were written by diplomats because of its accurate and abundant details. It is not too much to say that Kim Kun-Sea(金健瑞) was the specialist about Japanese society of the day who is the writer of Jeungjeongkyorinji(『增正交隣志』). So we can see that Kim Ji-Nam family left its footmarks as the great diplomats in the relations with Japan in the late period of Joseon Dynasty.
The members of Woo Bong Kim family had contributed to diplomatic system keeping on a good condition by not only diplomatic activities but also writings. It seems that Kim Kun-Seo could write a great book such as Jeungjeongkyorinji by succeeding his family traditions.
The summary of characteristics of Jeungjeongkyorinji is as follows.
First of all, it is abundant in contents. It was composed of 69 contents compared with 29 contents of Haedongjegukgi(『海東諸國記』) in the early of Joseon Dynasty and 36 contents of Tongmunkwanji(『通文館志』) in the late period of Joseon Dynasty.
Secondly, it shows well about the changes through 18-19th centuries from 17 centuries.
Thirdly, it is more focused on economics than Tongmunkwanji. For this point, Jeungjeongkyorinji is an important materials for not only use of business manuals about relations with Japan but also for research of Japanese economics.
Lastly, Jeungjeongkyorinji uses year-recording system based on the reign-style of King of Joseon, while Tongmunkwanji uses the Chinese way. Also it contains the contents about Eulreungdo(鬱陵島) and it shows the sensitive reaction against the territorial problems. It seems the expression of national consciousness motivated in the late of 18th century and also the result of Kim Kun-Seo’s self-consciousness.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 金指南의 『東?日錄』과 金顯門의『東?錄』
Ⅲ. 金健瑞의 『增正交隣志』
Ⅳ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
滄江 金澤榮 壽序 연구 : 韓‧中 知識人 교류 연구의 반성적 검토를 겸하여
민족문화연구
2013 .01
-
조선후기 牛峰金氏의 성립과 발전
역사와실학
2007 .09
-
增正交隣志의 史料的 性格
민족문화
1998 .12
-
소설『82 년생 김지영』을 거울로 비춰 본 중국 ‘바링허우’ 여성의 삶과 문화적 재현
중국어문학논집
2020 .06
-
明治時代の音楽用語の特徴に関する研究 : 『楽典』 · 『音楽問答』 · 『音楽指南』を中心に
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2018 .04
-
金鐘漢과 金素雲의 정지용 시 번역에 대하여
한국문학논총
2005 .01
-
朝鮮前期 士族勢力의 形成과 變遷 - 沙溪 金長生 집안을 中心으로
한국사상과 문화
2011 .01
-
Characteristics of Agricultural Techniques in 18th and 19th Century Joseon Dynasty
Korea Journal
2003 .03
-
망명자 김옥균(金玉均)에 대한 일본의 처우와 조선정책(1884~1890)
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
기억공간으로서의 길 : 15세기 후반 사림의 여행과 소통
역사와경계
2008 .12
-
조선후기 刀劒 素材 科擧 答案사례에 대한 一考察 -｢劒策問｣과 ｢劒對策文｣을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
동남제도개척사 김옥균의 활동과 영토ㆍ영해 인식 : 울릉도ㆍ독도 인식을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2012 .06
-
朝鮮 書院 一考 : 成立과 發達을 중심으로
역사교육
1975 .12
-
한국 근대시와 시적 표상공간으로서의 ‘서도’ 로컬리티 : 1920년대 시형식의 변화와 시적발화를 중심으로
동악어문학
2014 .02
-
보성전문학교에서 김일성종합대학으로 : 식민지 지식인 김광진의 생애와 경제사 연구
역사학보
2016 .12
-
「동심초」 번역과 김소월 시 창작방법 비교 연구
한국시학연구
2018 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
임진왜란과 17세기 조선 사회의 기억 : 元豪의 戰功과 조선 사회의 褒獎을 중심으로
정호훈
역사와실학
2009
.09
조선후기 倭語譯官 : 『譯科榜目』의 분석을 중심으로
김양수
역사와실학
2008
.12
영·정조시대(18세기)는 한국사의 르네상스였는가
김성윤
한국사 시민강좌
2007
.02
司馬榜目總錄
桂勳模
역사학보
1968
.08
Organization of Lithic Technology and Raw Material Availability : An Example with Suyanggae and Changnae Sites, Korea
Lee Kyong-Woo
,
Lee Yung-Jo
역사와실학
2007
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0