지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 7 - 36 (30page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The problem of drug abuse had been already seemed as a major plague of 20th century in the international society. The United Nation and other international organizations requires the cooperation of many countries and NGO in order to prohibit the illegal drug manufacturing and trafficking and to prevent the diffusion of drug abuse. Apart from the requirement of the international society, the governments of many countries already acknowledged the injurious effects of the narcotics and prohibited the sales and possession of a certain categories of narcotics except the usage for medical treatment.
The drug control strategies which each nation adopts are various and different according to the political condition and crime situation of each country. For example, the governments of some countries like USA and Japan adopted the strict prohibition strategy, and the manufacturing and trafficking of the drug usually is felony crime on which severe punishment is imposed. In Japan the drug abusers are treated as a criminal who is sentenced to the prison for some years at usual, and some drug abusers are sent to the medical center compulsorily for rehabilitation.
In some european countries like Netherlands, the government allows the sales and usage of some drugs like marijuana which is regarded as the soft drug. In Netherlands the government strives to avoiding the punishing of drug abuse and drug possession for own usage. The Methadone is supplied to some drug abusers under the prescription of the doctor for the purpose of medical treatment for abusers. But in Netherlands, the manufacturing and illegal trafficking of the narcotics without the permission of the government is regarded as a felony crime and the severe punishments are imposed upon the drug criminals.
Recently, some persons claim that the use of soft drug like marijuana ought to be allowed as one of the liberal acts in privacy. They say that the use and abuse of narcotics is seen as a self injuring by which no other people is injured. Also they claim that the governments of some european countries which allow the use of drug adopted some advanced drug policies and that governments occupied the progressive position in the realm of human rights above the other countries which don’t.
This sort of claims are wrong in some points. Firstly, the drug abuse is not a self injuring at all. For example, suppose a drug abuser who is driving a car on the street of a down town. People might be injured by him because he might be under influence of toxication, Secondly, the drug abuse is not a sort of liberal acts in the domain of privacy. The drug abuser needs some assistances of other people in the form of manufacturing and saling of the narcotics. But the manufacturing and saling of illicit drug is a felony crime under current penal code perhaps in almost countries. That is to say, the drug abuser can make other people a criminal and sent to the prison for the sake of abusers’ pleasure, In this perspective, the drug abuser causes as series of many illegal acts of manufacturing, trafficking, and saling drug, and the drug abuser must be blamed by the name of social justice. We can conclude that it is a matter of penal policy whether the drug abuser must be punished, because drug abuse brings about many related crimes.
It explains that the drug strategy of european countries which allow the possession of soft drug for own use is not a advanced position of their government. It is a kind of strategical choice which can make this government concentrate the countermeasure on control and prohibition of hard drug. The drug abuse is not a problem of human rights but only a target of penal strategy.
In my opinion the drug abuse for his own pleasure must be punished as a crime. Government must prohibit the possession of drug for own use. Because the allowance of possession for own use can cause the rapid dissemination of illegal drug in adolescents who can be easily influenced by social evil practices. The dissemination of drug in juveniles can bring about some deviant behaviors of teenagers including theft, rubbery, racketeering and prostitution.
In order to diminish the drug abusers, it is not sufficient to punish the abusers only for the just desert. Punishing the abusers can only add the number of recidivism of abusers, The abuser is not only a criminal but also a victim of illicit drug. So the probation must be practised with the program for rehabilitation of drug abusers. The program may include the probational supervision with drug test, recovery treatment and self-help group meetings like the drug court program of USA.
The drug control strategies which each nation adopts are various and different according to the political condition and crime situation of each country. For example, the governments of some countries like USA and Japan adopted the strict prohibition strategy, and the manufacturing and trafficking of the drug usually is felony crime on which severe punishment is imposed. In Japan the drug abusers are treated as a criminal who is sentenced to the prison for some years at usual, and some drug abusers are sent to the medical center compulsorily for rehabilitation.
In some european countries like Netherlands, the government allows the sales and usage of some drugs like marijuana which is regarded as the soft drug. In Netherlands the government strives to avoiding the punishing of drug abuse and drug possession for own usage. The Methadone is supplied to some drug abusers under the prescription of the doctor for the purpose of medical treatment for abusers. But in Netherlands, the manufacturing and illegal trafficking of the narcotics without the permission of the government is regarded as a felony crime and the severe punishments are imposed upon the drug criminals.
Recently, some persons claim that the use of soft drug like marijuana ought to be allowed as one of the liberal acts in privacy. They say that the use and abuse of narcotics is seen as a self injuring by which no other people is injured. Also they claim that the governments of some european countries which allow the use of drug adopted some advanced drug policies and that governments occupied the progressive position in the realm of human rights above the other countries which don’t.
This sort of claims are wrong in some points. Firstly, the drug abuse is not a self injuring at all. For example, suppose a drug abuser who is driving a car on the street of a down town. People might be injured by him because he might be under influence of toxication, Secondly, the drug abuse is not a sort of liberal acts in the domain of privacy. The drug abuser needs some assistances of other people in the form of manufacturing and saling of the narcotics. But the manufacturing and saling of illicit drug is a felony crime under current penal code perhaps in almost countries. That is to say, the drug abuser can make other people a criminal and sent to the prison for the sake of abusers’ pleasure, In this perspective, the drug abuser causes as series of many illegal acts of manufacturing, trafficking, and saling drug, and the drug abuser must be blamed by the name of social justice. We can conclude that it is a matter of penal policy whether the drug abuser must be punished, because drug abuse brings about many related crimes.
It explains that the drug strategy of european countries which allow the possession of soft drug for own use is not a advanced position of their government. It is a kind of strategical choice which can make this government concentrate the countermeasure on control and prohibition of hard drug. The drug abuse is not a problem of human rights but only a target of penal strategy.
In my opinion the drug abuse for his own pleasure must be punished as a crime. Government must prohibit the possession of drug for own use. Because the allowance of possession for own use can cause the rapid dissemination of illegal drug in adolescents who can be easily influenced by social evil practices. The dissemination of drug in juveniles can bring about some deviant behaviors of teenagers including theft, rubbery, racketeering and prostitution.
In order to diminish the drug abusers, it is not sufficient to punish the abusers only for the just desert. Punishing the abusers can only add the number of recidivism of abusers, The abuser is not only a criminal but also a victim of illicit drug. So the probation must be practised with the program for rehabilitation of drug abusers. The program may include the probational supervision with drug test, recovery treatment and self-help group meetings like the drug court program of USA.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 마약류 남용에 대한 대응 전략의 단계별 분석
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Actual Situation of Drug Abuse and Treatment of Drug Abusers in Japan
한림법학 FORUM
2004 .12
-
국제마약사범에 대한 특수수사방법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2004 .12
-
마약류 수요억제 및 마약류 사범 처우합리화를 위한 종합대책
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2005 .12
-
Drug Situation and Drug Control in Korea
형사정책연구
1994 .09
-
비행청소년 약물남용 행태의 변화와 정책적 함의
형사정책연구
2005 .06
-
마약류 중독자에 대한 치료현황 및 대책에 대한 연구
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
마약류범죄의 처벌에 대한 소고 - 연성 마약을 중심으로 -
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
마약류범죄에 대한 통제방안 연구
원광법학
2009 .01
-
우리나라 마약실태의 위험과 그 대응방안에 관한 연구
한국치안행정논집
2019 .01
-
마약류중독자의 치료보호제도 개선방안
교정연구
2011 .01
-
마약류사범 보호관찰 확대 등 사후관리 방안 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2017 .11
-
마약류감시원제도의 운영실태와 개선방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
국내 마약류 확산에 따른 합리적 대처방안
한양법학
2019 .11
-
痲藥類犯罪의 實態와 需要抑制 戰略
교정연구
2002 .01
-
청소년들의 약물 남용에 대한 조사 연구
한국사회안전학회지
2001 .07
-
낮은 자기통제력과 성인의 약물남용, 그 매개 및 상호작용효과에 관한 논의
형사정책연구
2006 .12
-
미국의 약물정책 - 약물범죄에 대한 투쟁 및 치료처우를 중심으로 -
경찰학논총
2008 .01
-
마약 및 조직범죄의 형사정책적 현안과 종합적 대응방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0