지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to discuss several lessons from an analysis of the American history of governmental regulation on total air emission levels from industrial sources, which are applicable to similar Korean efforts currently underway, including those from judicial review of administrative rulemaking.
We can learn several lessons from the U.S. experience with air pollution caps management. First, the scope of cap-and-trade programs should be national or regional, because the large size of the emissions trading market tends to guarantee efficient market functioning, and because a nation- or region-wide cap-and-trade program is the most effective way of addressing transboundary pollution. Second, new and existing sources should be equally treated in order to promote clean energy development. Third, emissions trading must provide for declining caps on total emission levels, thereby increasing the economic value of pollution reductions and promoting the commercialization of clean energy technologies and stat-of-the-art pollution control technologies. Also, baseline emissions must be established in a manner that gives covered sources enough incentive to reduce pollution at the early stages of implementation. Fourth, allowing banking and opt-ins is critically important to induce early reduction efforts by covered sources. Lastly, the economic feasibility of real-time pollution monitoring is the necessary precondition for the successful implementation of emissions trading, along with building an electronized real-time information tracking system on permit transactions and pollution emissions.
We can learn several lessons from the U.S. experience with air pollution caps management. First, the scope of cap-and-trade programs should be national or regional, because the large size of the emissions trading market tends to guarantee efficient market functioning, and because a nation- or region-wide cap-and-trade program is the most effective way of addressing transboundary pollution. Second, new and existing sources should be equally treated in order to promote clean energy development. Third, emissions trading must provide for declining caps on total emission levels, thereby increasing the economic value of pollution reductions and promoting the commercialization of clean energy technologies and stat-of-the-art pollution control technologies. Also, baseline emissions must be established in a manner that gives covered sources enough incentive to reduce pollution at the early stages of implementation. Fourth, allowing banking and opt-ins is critically important to induce early reduction efforts by covered sources. Lastly, the economic feasibility of real-time pollution monitoring is the necessary precondition for the successful implementation of emissions trading, along with building an electronized real-time information tracking system on permit transactions and pollution emissions.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 淸淨大氣法의 기본틀과 聯邦主義와 法治行政의 原理
Ⅲ. 地域別 大氣汚染總量管理制의 形成과 問題點
Ⅳ. 廣域別 大氣汚染總量管理制의 出帆
Ⅴ. 美國의 經驗이 주는 諸敎訓
Ⅵ. 結論
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대기오염물질 배출목록 구축 현황과 과제
경기논단
2002 .12
-
배출권거래제 시범도입 및 운영방안
자원·환경경제연구
2001 .01
-
패널분석을 이용한 “5+2” 권역별 공해배출과 제조업 생산성 간 영향분석
지역사회연구
2011 .12
-
Measuring Urban Greenhouse Gas Emissions : Direct vs. Indirect Emissions
한국도시행정학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2013 .09
-
배출권 거래제도를 통해 본 지구기후변화정치 : 중국을 중심으로
아세아연구
2010 .09
-
수도권 지역 자동차 NOx 배출량의 연도별 변화추세와 원인 분석
환경정책
2011 .12
-
통합적 환경관리제도에 관한 소고
한양법학
2011 .02
-
배출권거래제도 － 형평성을 중심으로 －
경영법률
2013 .01
-
배출권거래제도에서의 CO₂ 배출량 산정 방법의 경제성 비교 분석
환경정책
2008 .05
-
배출권거래제 도입에 따른 자본시장법의 적용상 한계와 개선방안
증권법연구
2010 .04
-
An Emission Tax Pollution Control System with Imperfect Monitoring
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2009 .04
-
排出權의 法的 性質
비교사법
2010 .03
-
순회배송 물류전략에서 탄소배출 비용의 효과 분석
한국경영과학회지
2015 .02
-
배출권거래의 민사법적 고찰
법학연구
2011 .02
-
수도권 미세먼지 집중배출지역 분석
정책연구
2018 .11
-
低炭素 綠色成長 인프라 構築을 위한 온실가스 排出權 去來制度에 관한 硏究 : － 排出權의 法的 性格과 資本市場法上 爭點을 中心으로 －
비교사법
2011 .03
-
미국법상 미세먼지 규제의 주요내용과 시사점
강원법학
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0