지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The current law grants property rights called "program copyright" to the computer programs as the basic frame of protecting computer programs. Infringement upon such rights is prevented through civil trial (provisional disposition and/or action on principal matters) on one hand, and by imposing punishment through investigation and criminal trial on the other hand. Thus the protection of computer programs in general has been considered as the duty of court, prosecution and criminal police as the area covered by the Civil Code' Civil Procedure Act and the Criminal Code' Criminal Procedure Act.
As even the ordinary property rights form the basis of law and order, in an urgent situation where court protection cannot be received, the administrative police in charge of public safety and order carry authorities and obligations to intervene.
Furthermore today, in an area with strong public nature such as construction, city planning, immission, and environment, even the problem related to property rights between individuals is included as being subject to administrative control. Considering the national and social importance and international value, and the interest of the users, the computer program is a new type of property rights featuring extremely high public value, one of important elements forming the modem law and order, and social order.
Accordingly, the protection of computer programs should not be regarded as the sole duty of court and prosecution for passive maintenance of order, but should also be regarded as the duty of administration that actively form social order by harmonizing diversified conflicting profits.
With the awareness of such problems, this research attempts to search for the basic structure of the administrative law system aimed at protecting computer programs. In relation to this, this research first will examine the possibility, requirement and the procedure of protecting computer programs by the administrative police; second, analyze the collection, deletion and destruction (Article 34) of the illegal copies stipulated in the Computer Program Protection Law from the viewpoint of administrative investigation and procedures in order to check the constitutionality, relations with the warrant system, relations with the investigating procedures, possibility of participating by the victim, and the problem related to the direct or indirect compulsory power; and third, prescribe items related to computer programs as the condition of approving businesses, use of illegal copies as the ground for administrative punishment such as the cancellation of license, and will discuss ways of installing special administrative committee carrying administrative legislative authority and semi-judicial power.
As even the ordinary property rights form the basis of law and order, in an urgent situation where court protection cannot be received, the administrative police in charge of public safety and order carry authorities and obligations to intervene.
Furthermore today, in an area with strong public nature such as construction, city planning, immission, and environment, even the problem related to property rights between individuals is included as being subject to administrative control. Considering the national and social importance and international value, and the interest of the users, the computer program is a new type of property rights featuring extremely high public value, one of important elements forming the modem law and order, and social order.
Accordingly, the protection of computer programs should not be regarded as the sole duty of court and prosecution for passive maintenance of order, but should also be regarded as the duty of administration that actively form social order by harmonizing diversified conflicting profits.
With the awareness of such problems, this research attempts to search for the basic structure of the administrative law system aimed at protecting computer programs. In relation to this, this research first will examine the possibility, requirement and the procedure of protecting computer programs by the administrative police; second, analyze the collection, deletion and destruction (Article 34) of the illegal copies stipulated in the Computer Program Protection Law from the viewpoint of administrative investigation and procedures in order to check the constitutionality, relations with the warrant system, relations with the investigating procedures, possibility of participating by the victim, and the problem related to the direct or indirect compulsory power; and third, prescribe items related to computer programs as the condition of approving businesses, use of illegal copies as the ground for administrative punishment such as the cancellation of license, and will discuss ways of installing special administrative committee carrying administrative legislative authority and semi-judicial power.
목차
Ⅰ. 序說
Ⅱ. 行政警察에 의한 컴퓨터프로그램 보호
Ⅲ. 不正複制物 등의 收去ㆍ削去ㆍ廢棄措置(컴퓨터프로그램보호법 제34조)
Ⅳ. 컴퓨터프로그램 보호를 위한 行政法的 制度의 摸索
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Staats- und Staatenverantwortung für den Schutz von Computerprogrammen : Ein Beitrag insbesondere zur Rolle des Verwaltungsrechts in Deutschland und der EU
행정법연구
2002 .08
-
글로벌 시대의 公益論
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
사회보장행정의 절차법적 모델의 탐구를 위한 기초연구
한양법학
2010 .02
-
國際聯合行政上의 諸問題
국제법학회논총
1960 .04
-
행정지도와 법률유보 및 구제에 관한 이론적 검토
한양법학
2011 .08
-
東アジアにおける比較行政法の可能性
동북아법연구
2012 .01
-
현행 컴퓨터프로그램보호법제의 문제점과 개선방안 : 프로그램 불법복제 단속의 법적 문제를 중심으로
행정법연구
2002 .08
-
행정조사와 특별사법경찰관리의 수사의 경계획정 : 특별사법경찰관리의 직무를 중심으로
경찰학연구
2014 .12
-
환경문제에 대한 행정법적 대응과 행정구제
한림법학 FORUM
2006 .11
-
컴퓨터 프로그램 사범에 대한 검찰의 법집행활동
행정법연구
2002 .08
-
행정법학의 개념과그 외연(外延) : 제도중심의 공법학방법론을 위한 시론(試論)
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
동아시아 행정심판제도 비교연구
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
行政節次法上 處分基準 設定ㆍ公表와 合議制 行政廳의 行政節次
행정법연구
2008 .04
-
행정의 행위형식으로서의‘행정계획’개념에 대한 검토－헌법재판소 2000. 6. 1. 선고, 99헌마538등 결정,대법원 1982. 3. 9. 선고, 80누105 판결 및 대법원 2002.10. 11. 선고, 2000두8226 판결에 대한 평석－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
컴퓨터 프로그램 보호를 위한 행정지도 방안
행정법연구
2002 .08
-
행정질서벌에 대한 再考
원광법학
2009 .01
-
행정형법론의 비판적 검토
형사법연구
2009 .01
-
미국 행정절차법 연구 : 미국 행정법상 절차적 권리의 유효사거리에 관하여
행정법연구
2004 .10
-
현대의 행정 변화와 행정법학 방법론 연구 : 전통적 행정법학의 방법론 분석과 그 보완을 위한 시론(試論)
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
中国2014年《行政诉讼法》修正案的主要内容及未来发展
동북아법연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
컴퓨터프로그램보호법상 단속처분 및 행정조사법제의 문제점과 개선방안
박정훈
행정법연구
2003
.10
行政法과 ‘民主’의 自覺 : 한국 행정법학의 미래
朴正勳
행정법연구
2018
.05
行政法과 法解釋 - 法律留保 내지 議會留保와 法形成의 限界 - : 대법원 2014. 4. 10. 선고 2011두31604 폐차신고수리거부처분취소사건 판결을 중심으로
박정훈
행정법연구
2015
.11
[특강_중요 쟁점문제(행정법)] 행정부작위와 국가배상책임의 해석
박정훈
고시계
2014
.01
[행정법] 이유제시의 하자, 이유제시의 하자의 치유 가능성과 치유의 시간적 한계, 처분이유의 사후변경, 집행정지(거부처분), 판결의 형성력 · 기속력(반복금지효 · 재처분의무)
박정훈
고시계
2013
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0