지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is the “Peasant Struggle“ in the year of 1862, Korea that is well~known as one of the biggest struggles in the late Josun Dynasty. Thus, it makes sense to conduct the researches on how people judge and act concerning this struggle during those times. But, studying on the masterminds of the Peasant Struggle is not easy because of the lack of the relevant data. Meanwhile, those times found omost ruling group moving to oppress and settle any unfortunate incidents. Among them were officers dispatched as the positions of ‘Royal Secret Commissioner(暗行御史)’, ‘Inspection Commissioner(宣撫使)’ and ‘Prosecution Commissioner(按?使)’, to local regions where such incidents arose. And, they intervened in the foregoing struggle at the distance closest from where it happened. In palticular, Yi Sam~hyeon was dispatched as "Inspection Commissioner" to Kyungsang province, the most crucial hub of the struggle. In late period when such struggle was frequently waged, Yi visited Hamheung province to take the position as “Prosecution Commissioner“, making achievements there. This research thesis explored the "Peasant Struggle" through different books by Yi Sam~hyeon, with the evaluations on methods that he established.
As the "Inspection Commissioner(宣撫使)", Yi Sam~hyeon can, first of all, understand the local situations by going around about a month, under the instruction to visit and inspect each region. But, a great deal of hardship and outcry of local average citizens including peasants impelled Yi to alleviate their sufferings by means of makeshift. Amid these situations, he advised them to follow his own logics and the government authority, in the face of their demands.
As a Prosecution Commissioner(按?使)", he showed legal and righteous attitude to the masterminds of ’Peasant Struggle in Hamheung’ in the process of settling the struggle. And such attitude is considered most progressive. For instance, he tried to lift punishment policies against crime without dubious but substantial criminal evidence. And, he was apt to he generous on his subjective judgments. It is deemed that not his own moral attitude but right response to such struggle can make him generous.
In this regard, Yi wrote "Peasant Struggle" and "Three State Finance System(三政)": "Field", "Military" and" Grain". In addition, he stated fundamental systems such as "Non-governmental Autonomous Poor Relief Systems(社倉制)" and “Land Measurement System(量田)“. And, he made much attack on government financial management operation(罷還歸結). As the typical case, he held that “Public Financial Loss Compensation system" provided as the solution to redress three wrong financial systems, was not appropriated. Although the above system required reducing much amount of exchange grain, this imposed not interest of exchange grain but land tax through the establishment of “Settled Grain System(還穀)“. On top of these, Yi Sam~hyeon is found to have had views on People’s lives and State. His concerns, such as these, can be regarded as the product of "Peasant Struggle".
As the "Inspection Commissioner(宣撫使)", Yi Sam~hyeon can, first of all, understand the local situations by going around about a month, under the instruction to visit and inspect each region. But, a great deal of hardship and outcry of local average citizens including peasants impelled Yi to alleviate their sufferings by means of makeshift. Amid these situations, he advised them to follow his own logics and the government authority, in the face of their demands.
As a Prosecution Commissioner(按?使)", he showed legal and righteous attitude to the masterminds of ’Peasant Struggle in Hamheung’ in the process of settling the struggle. And such attitude is considered most progressive. For instance, he tried to lift punishment policies against crime without dubious but substantial criminal evidence. And, he was apt to he generous on his subjective judgments. It is deemed that not his own moral attitude but right response to such struggle can make him generous.
In this regard, Yi wrote "Peasant Struggle" and "Three State Finance System(三政)": "Field", "Military" and" Grain". In addition, he stated fundamental systems such as "Non-governmental Autonomous Poor Relief Systems(社倉制)" and “Land Measurement System(量田)“. And, he made much attack on government financial management operation(罷還歸結). As the typical case, he held that “Public Financial Loss Compensation system" provided as the solution to redress three wrong financial systems, was not appropriated. Although the above system required reducing much amount of exchange grain, this imposed not interest of exchange grain but land tax through the establishment of “Settled Grain System(還穀)“. On top of these, Yi Sam~hyeon is found to have had views on People’s lives and State. His concerns, such as these, can be regarded as the product of "Peasant Struggle".
목차
1. 머리말
2. 선무의 길 : 설득과 좌절
3. 안핵의 길 : 처벌과 愼刑
4. 삼정의 인식 : 원인과 대책
5. 맺음말
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
蔚山 農民抗爭의 考察
한국민족문화
1992 .12
-
Peasant
Korea Journal
1988 .09
-
李敦宇의 관료생활과 임술농민항쟁 수습 및 삼정이정책
한국인물사연구
2014 .09
-
19세기 原州지역의 환곡문제와 농민항쟁
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .11
-
신라하대 농민항쟁의 특징
International Journal of Korean History
2000 .12
-
The Problem of Identity among Peasant Women in Korea
Korea Journal
1998 .06
-
1862년 삼정이정논의와 환곡정책의 전개
역사연구
2012 .12
-
武人政權下의 農民抗爭
한국사 시민강좌
1991 .02
-
Historical Characteristics of the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
1930년대 농촌소설의 농민의식 반영 양상 : 김유정론
비평문학
2006 .12
-
Tracing the Course of the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
개발독재기 농민의 경제적 생존전략 다시 보기: 자본주의-소농사회 접합의 일단(一端)
민족문화연구
2016 .01
-
한국 농민운동의 동향과 실태 연구
성곡논총
1989 .08
-
근현대 농민소설과 물의 재현
국어문학
2012 .02
-
한국 농민시 연구 서설
국어국문학
1990 .12
-
1862년 농민항쟁과 소통의 정책
한국사연구
2013 .06
-
농촌산업화에 따른 농민예술의 변화 : 아산시 송악면 평촌들을 중심으로
실천민속학연구
2010 .02
-
北宋 後期 西北邊 開邊策의 수행과 武臣 · 宦官의 활용 : 帥臣 · 大帥 임용을 중심으로
동양사학연구
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0