메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제71호
발행연도
2009.3
수록면
291 - 319 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Examined in this article, are the current situation of historical studies based upon oral statements, and certain tasks as well that are related to those studies and require further attention and address. Purpose of this examination is to determine the prospect of this particular area of studies, and find ways to enhance them in the future. The main question is, basically, what the Korean historians should do in order to elevate this area of studies, from merely producing and accumulating records of oral statements, to a new level of producing actual historical studies based upon them. The probable answer to such question, is extensively discussed in this article, based upon the author's personal experiences.
In Korea, people's interest in the contemporary history has arisen significantly since the end of the 1980s. And out of efforts to secure information, which would shed some light on the task of pursuing events that happened in those days, yet at the same time would not appear in any official records or documents, historical studies based upon oral statements('Oral History' from now on) were initiated in the form of securing testimonies. In mid-1990s, theories and methodology of the Western scholars (engaged in Oral history) were introduced to Korea through the activities of anthropologists, and such introduction paved the way for full-blown Oral history studies in Korea. Coming into the 2000s, the Oral history studies were upgraded once again, armed with the historical perception of viewing history 'from below', which happened to be fairly critical of certain aspects of the modern society.
The society of Korean historians are still very much captured and restrained by the principle of 'Positivism', and they remain skeptical of the merit and validity of Oral history studies, because the very material(oral statements) are considered to be fairly subjective by many people. But in that regard, other materials cannot escape the charge of being subjective either, so the concept of historical objectivity itself should be reviewed and reestablished. The past experiences, and the memories of that past shared by present day people, and not to mention the discrepancy and potential conflicts between them, should be dealt with more seriously and more comprehensively in the future. The past reality should be determined more accurately and with more details, while the present day memory of them should be analyzed with many things considered and with a more proactive viewpoint. Hopefully, the Korean society of historians would be more active and progressive in Oral history studies in the future, and open a new chapter for such studies in Korea based upon the uniqueness of Korean situations and the general characteristics of historical studies.

목차

1. 어느덧 만개한 구술사?
2. 한국 구술사의 역정
3. 역사학자의 관점에서 바라본 구술사
4. 역사학과 구술사의 아름다운 만남을 꿈꾸며
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0