지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Danseong-hyeon households led by widows were usually registered as Yeoho in the census register. Yeoho were regarded as belonging to a Hwan Kwa Ko Dok type of household a classification which included widowers, widows, orphans, and the elderly people with no children. These Hwan Kwa Ko Dok households were considered to be the primary recipients of welfare benefits from the monarch. The existence of such households posed a serious problem for the king who was responsible for guaranteeing a minimum living standard for his people. Therefore, Hwan Kwa Ko Dok households, including households led by widows, were both the beneficiaries of the welfare policy and a burden for the government. To remedy this and gain a better understanding of this class the government launched a census, which eventually resulted in the formation of the Hwan Kwa Ko Dok Seongchaek.
This Hwan Kwa Ko Dok Seongchaek only considered households led by widows or widowers as being independent households. As such, the basic prerequisite that was required to be considered as a household was marriage, which meant that only the households led by widows and widowers could be considered to be independent households. As such, widows and widowers suddenly found themselves being included in the same category.
In fact, the most outstanding characteristic of Danseong-hyeons censor register is that widowers were put into the same category as widows. Another important characteristic of this censor register was that not all widows were included within it. As such, the entry Hwan or Kwa in the censor register was a code which was applied to those households which could receive welfare benefits or be exempted from taxes. Moreover, attention should be paid to the fact that a similar ratio of widows and widowers was found in the register. This phenomenon originated from the governments intention of maintaining a certain ratio of such households.
The question thus becomes why did the government want to maintain such a ratio of widows and widowers? While households led by widows and widowers were recipients of welfare benefits, they were also recognized by many as not being a household in the true sense of the word and as being an excessive burden on the states welfare functions. Therefore, any increase in the number of these fake households resulted in increasing the central governments burden. This was why the central government established a policy of maintaining a certain ratio of widows and widowers within the register.
This Hwan Kwa Ko Dok Seongchaek only considered households led by widows or widowers as being independent households. As such, the basic prerequisite that was required to be considered as a household was marriage, which meant that only the households led by widows and widowers could be considered to be independent households. As such, widows and widowers suddenly found themselves being included in the same category.
In fact, the most outstanding characteristic of Danseong-hyeons censor register is that widowers were put into the same category as widows. Another important characteristic of this censor register was that not all widows were included within it. As such, the entry Hwan or Kwa in the censor register was a code which was applied to those households which could receive welfare benefits or be exempted from taxes. Moreover, attention should be paid to the fact that a similar ratio of widows and widowers was found in the register. This phenomenon originated from the governments intention of maintaining a certain ratio of such households.
The question thus becomes why did the government want to maintain such a ratio of widows and widowers? While households led by widows and widowers were recipients of welfare benefits, they were also recognized by many as not being a household in the true sense of the word and as being an excessive burden on the states welfare functions. Therefore, any increase in the number of these fake households resulted in increasing the central governments burden. This was why the central government established a policy of maintaining a certain ratio of widows and widowers within the register.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 女戶의 기재형태
Ⅲ. 女戶에 대한 인식과 편제
Ⅳ. 寡婦ㆍ寡女戶 및 鰥夫戶의 성격
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일제시기 民籍簿의 작성과 女性戶主의 성격 ―19세기 濟州 戶籍中草, 光武戶籍과의 비교를 중심으로
대동문화연구
2007 .01
-
조선 후기 호적, 호구의 성격과 새로운 쟁점
한국사연구
2006 .12
-
Support Systems of Korean Widows
Korea Journal
1984 .01
-
守節과 再嫁 사이에서 : 식민지시기 寡婦담론
한국사연구
2014 .03
-
조선후기 호적에 대한 이해 : 논쟁과 과제
한국사연구
2014 .06
-
Life and Work of Korean War Widows during the 1950s
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .12
-
과부의 헌금: “칭찬”인가 “경고”인가? : 마가복음 12:41-44
신학논단
2006 .02
-
쇼(G. B. Shaw)의 『홀아비 촌』(Widowers' Houses)에 나타난 풍자성
새한영어영문학
1998 .05
-
조선왕조의 戶籍과 통치체계
동양사학연구
2015 .06
-
The Widow`s Suicide in Pre-Modern Korean Society
Korea Journal
1996 .06
-
17·18세기 호적대장의 私奴婢 기재 실태 -경상도 단성현 권대유家 노비를 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2004 .01
-
고려시대 출생자(出生者)의 파악과 호적(戶籍)
역사와현실
2008 .09
-
한국전쟁과 여성의 존재 양상 : 염상섭의 「미망인」과 「화관」 연작
한국근대문학연구
2004 .04
-
현대사회의 노인문화 연구 – 남성노인의 성 인식과 삶의 만족도를 중심으로 –
한국사상과 문화
2009 .01
-
염상섭 소설의 전쟁 미망인
현대소설연구
2020 .06
-
18세기 호적상 ‘主戶’의 존재 양태와 戶의 모습에 대한 일고찰 : 1714년 대구 조암방 호적을 중심으로
역사와경계
2008 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018340093