지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Man is a social being who lives together with other persons. To live peacefully one another in the very complicated and money-driven society each of human beings has to practice the art of living together with others. Man himself should remain as man who has an ability to treat other as man who deserves human dignity, otherwise man is apt to fall down into an animal-being who is thought to be opposite to a human being.
In the period of economic crisis man concentrates himself only to survive in a society hard to keep living, so he has no room to think how to live a morally good life and it becomes hard for him to make an effort to be a morally good person. When he thinks of (biological) existence only, it is almost hard for him to reflect and lead his (moral) life. At the time of the oppression of poverty and economic depression mutual care between fellow -human beings is required to live together.
Obviously a human being starts his life as a biological person, but he should strive to be a being human who is a moral person. The biological person is only a person before he makes himself be a moral one. The dignity of a person starts as the biological being, but the social recognition is given to the moral being. Therefore it is more important to ask who man is than what he is.
A view of a human being shows the degree in which each estimates the dignity of man. Many people, especially including some animal ecological scholars and behavioristic psychologists, consider a human being as a member of the kingdom of animal. Some people regards him as machine producing goods, and some looks him as the goods itself. These three views underestimate the dignity of human beings. The fourth view is to look the man as a divine being who has the image of God. When we take the fourth view, it is possible for the human being to achieve the personality of the image of God.
The question of 'who is man?' is morally more desirable than the Question of 'what is man?' A human being needs a model to make him 'being human', because he has learned and continues to learn almost everything by imitating the life of model who is thought to have lead a morally good life. Some moral characteristics of the good model of being human contain, I think, at least virtues like responsibility, humility and love. These three virtues should be considered as the fundamental ones for the achievement of the human task of 'being human' and 'right living.'
In the period of economic crisis man concentrates himself only to survive in a society hard to keep living, so he has no room to think how to live a morally good life and it becomes hard for him to make an effort to be a morally good person. When he thinks of (biological) existence only, it is almost hard for him to reflect and lead his (moral) life. At the time of the oppression of poverty and economic depression mutual care between fellow -human beings is required to live together.
Obviously a human being starts his life as a biological person, but he should strive to be a being human who is a moral person. The biological person is only a person before he makes himself be a moral one. The dignity of a person starts as the biological being, but the social recognition is given to the moral being. Therefore it is more important to ask who man is than what he is.
A view of a human being shows the degree in which each estimates the dignity of man. Many people, especially including some animal ecological scholars and behavioristic psychologists, consider a human being as a member of the kingdom of animal. Some people regards him as machine producing goods, and some looks him as the goods itself. These three views underestimate the dignity of human beings. The fourth view is to look the man as a divine being who has the image of God. When we take the fourth view, it is possible for the human being to achieve the personality of the image of God.
The question of 'who is man?' is morally more desirable than the Question of 'what is man?' A human being needs a model to make him 'being human', because he has learned and continues to learn almost everything by imitating the life of model who is thought to have lead a morally good life. Some moral characteristics of the good model of being human contain, I think, at least virtues like responsibility, humility and love. These three virtues should be considered as the fundamental ones for the achievement of the human task of 'being human' and 'right living.'
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 생존투쟁에 놓인 자기고착(自己固着)과 인격완성을 향하는 타인배려(他人配慮)
Ⅲ. 인격적 존재로의 변형과 도덕적 실천을 위한 인간이해
Ⅳ. ‘인간됨’의 모델 - 누가 사람이냐?
Ⅴ. ‘바로삶’의 내용 - 어떻게 살아야 하나?
Ⅵ. 나가는 말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
공부와 도덕 : 도덕적 행위로서의 공부와 공부의 표현으로서의 삶
신학과 목회
2007 .04
-
포스트휴먼은 인간의 존엄성을 위협하는가?
철학논총
2018 .10
-
The Human Condition
Korea Journal
1979 .11
-
천인합일에서 천과 인간의 관계 지향성 연구-도덕으로서의 理의 조건에 관한 고찰-
동서철학연구
2018 .01
-
구약성서 인간론 ―“마음(심장)”에 대하여
신학과 선교
2019 .01
-
동기부여와 인간개발, 자기관리형 인간의 탄생 ―1970~80년대 한국에서 인간개발 담론과 ‘성과주체’ 생산
역사비평
2020 .08
-
기독교와 인성
신학과 복음
2017 .06
-
비트겐슈타인의 확실한 것들과 인간 존엄 및 인간 생명 존중
인간연구
2014 .01
-
인간교육에서 영성교육의 중요성
한국기독교신학논총
2001 .09
-
현대과학의 신학적 인간 이해에 대한 도전
한국조직신학논총
2007 .01
-
인권의 개념
민족연구
2011 .01
-
삼위일체 신관에서 본 기독교의 인간 이해
한국기독교신학논총
2001 .04
-
맹자가 추구한 이상적 인간상의 특성과 역할에 관한 고찰
한국철학논집
2019 .01
-
그리스도교 사상 안에서의 인간존엄성 근거 : 토마스 아퀴나스와 마르틴 루터를 중심으로
철학연구
2005 .11
-
한중일 인문 전통의 활용과 전망 - 21세기 실학의 모색 -
민족연구
2014 .01
-
영미아동 환경문학에 나타난 인간과 동물
영어영문학연구
2017 .01
-
Is the Morality of Human Beings Superior to the Morality of Non-Human Beings? : Debate over Human versus Animal Nature in the Joseon Period
Korea Journal
2011 .03
-
하나님의 형상과 그리스도인의 성품
신학지남
2015 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0100-2009-230-018284863