지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The 'Mouse Roasting Scandal' is a trivial offence in which the tails of two mice were roasted by someone in the palace. But the scandal was accepted as a magic, which aimed to curse the crown prince. The crime was to be sentenced to death. King's mother sent a memorandum in which she explained the situation concerning the scandal and by this letter was suspected Ms. Park the concubine of the king as the instigator without any crucial evidence. For it was believed until then that she had felt angry at the maltreatment of her status and was supposed to be the most beneficiary of the prince's probable death, As a result she was sentenced to being a commoner and her son was stripped of his royal peerage.
After three years Jongik Lee a confucian scholar appealed to the king concerning the scandal. He urged that when Jung Shim was the left prime minister, he took a bribe from the deposed concubine and the real instigator of the scandal should be Hee Kim the son of Anro Kim, who had the political hegemony in his hands at that time, It is necessary to find out the results of the appeal. Shim was sentenced to death after the debate in the criminal department. Lee was sentenced to be exiled and to be poisoned to death. This was a rare condemnation compared with other cases. But Hee Kim was set free. These results suggest that the scandal might not be a simple happening but a fragment of dark and deep conspiracy involving the conflict between the old-new ministries and the appointment of the next king. For in Lee's letter there were a lot of secrets and important issues unaccessible to the scholars like Lee.
Another scandal happened in May 1533. It was called 'Wooden Idol Scandal.' The shape of the prince's head was carved on the top part of wooden idol and the curse was written on lower part of it. When it was found, Ryo Hong the son in law of Ms. Park was accused of having made it. Although there was no evidence relating to him. Ms. Park and her son was condemned to die. Their penalty was due to the supposition that the probable death of the prince should bring great advantage to them. But it was a serous misunderstanding to believe that Ms. Park would become queen and her son be crown prince despite of their social status. For first of all we can find out that such promotion was impossible considering the rigid status and the order of succession of that time.
It is well known that the removal of Ms. Park and her son was favorite factor to the 'Soyun' faction, to which belonged the queen Moonjung and the crown prince too. But there was not positive reason to remove Ms. Park for the benefit of the faction and Won Hysong Yun the leader of the faction did not appear on stage un til the 28th year of king Jungjong. So it is most probable that they might be interested in the scandal but didn't have to participate in the scandals. In sum we may conclude that Anro Kim's faction be the conspirator of a series of scandals. and the scandals are judged to have been small fragments of a big political conspiracy.
After three years Jongik Lee a confucian scholar appealed to the king concerning the scandal. He urged that when Jung Shim was the left prime minister, he took a bribe from the deposed concubine and the real instigator of the scandal should be Hee Kim the son of Anro Kim, who had the political hegemony in his hands at that time, It is necessary to find out the results of the appeal. Shim was sentenced to death after the debate in the criminal department. Lee was sentenced to be exiled and to be poisoned to death. This was a rare condemnation compared with other cases. But Hee Kim was set free. These results suggest that the scandal might not be a simple happening but a fragment of dark and deep conspiracy involving the conflict between the old-new ministries and the appointment of the next king. For in Lee's letter there were a lot of secrets and important issues unaccessible to the scholars like Lee.
Another scandal happened in May 1533. It was called 'Wooden Idol Scandal.' The shape of the prince's head was carved on the top part of wooden idol and the curse was written on lower part of it. When it was found, Ryo Hong the son in law of Ms. Park was accused of having made it. Although there was no evidence relating to him. Ms. Park and her son was condemned to die. Their penalty was due to the supposition that the probable death of the prince should bring great advantage to them. But it was a serous misunderstanding to believe that Ms. Park would become queen and her son be crown prince despite of their social status. For first of all we can find out that such promotion was impossible considering the rigid status and the order of succession of that time.
It is well known that the removal of Ms. Park and her son was favorite factor to the 'Soyun' faction, to which belonged the queen Moonjung and the crown prince too. But there was not positive reason to remove Ms. Park for the benefit of the faction and Won Hysong Yun the leader of the faction did not appear on stage un til the 28th year of king Jungjong. So it is most probable that they might be interested in the scandal but didn't have to participate in the scandals. In sum we may conclude that Anro Kim's faction be the conspirator of a series of scandals. and the scandals are judged to have been small fragments of a big political conspiracy.
목차
Ⅰ. 序言
Ⅱ. 王室 내부의 갈등 관계
Ⅲ. 事件의 발생과 그 전개
Ⅳ. 金安老의 재등장과 주도권 장악
Ⅴ. 結語
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
'추문 학교', 가치 부재의 세계인가?
고전 르네상스 영문학
2003 .01
-
사회적 텍스트로 본 『스캔들 학교』
고전 르네상스 영문학
2012 .01
-
파나마운하 정경유착 비리와 1890년대 프랑스의 정치변화
史叢(사총)
2012 .01
-
라합(Rahab)의 스캔들(scandal)로 바라본 Me Too
제3시대
2018 .03
-
고려시대의 태자 책봉과 책봉례
역사와경계
2011 .09
-
The Political Economy of US-Korean Relations : Park Chung-hee, Kim Jong-p’il, and the 1962 Stock Exchange Scandal
학술대회
2005 .12
-
[특집 - 과학기술학(STS)자들이 '황우석 사건'을 본격 분석하다] 과학기술학은 '황우석 사태'를 어떻게 읽어야 하는가?
역사비평
2006 .02
-
[특집 - 과학기술학(STS)자들이 '황우석 사건'을 본격 분석하다] 황우석 사태를 통한 한국의 과학문화 진단
역사비평
2006 .02
-
17세기 이여순(李女順) 소문의 힘과 가부장 사회의 대응
韓國古典硏究
2014 .01
-
고구려의 태자 책봉제 수용 과정 고찰
한국사연구
2011 .06
-
현대소설의 형성과 스캔들 : 횡보의 〈진주는 주었으나〉를 중심으로
국어국문학
2006 .09
-
Meaning of Laughter in The Country Wife and The School for Scandal
고전 르네상스 영문학
2007 .01
-
1930년대 신학 갈등 ‘아빙돈 주석 사건’에 대한 쟁점 관련 번역분석
한국학논집
2019 .06
-
칼뱅의 “스캔들” 이론과 오늘의 목회적 현실
신학지남
2006 .03
-
조선전기 어우동 사건에 대한 재검토
역사연구
2007 .12
-
조선초기 왕세자의 국가의례 참여와 그 성격
역사민속학
2009 .07
-
기묘사화 전개과정과 중종의 역할
국학연구
2017 .11
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0100-2009-911-018287599