지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The subject of international investment law is mainly about issues surrounding the protection of investors based on general international law and bilateral or multi-lateral international investment agreements.
It is well established international rules that the treaty rights of investors are protected by densely knitted networks of international treaties and customary international law. Investors are enjoying national treatment, most-favoured-nations treatment, and full compensation in the event of expropriation. They are entitled to initiate claims directly against host states through investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. Korea has negotiated and concluded more than 80 BITs, and ranks the second in Asian regions in terms of the numbers of BITs to which Korea is a party. Korea is also preparing for FTAs with various states.
Many controversial issues have been raised in international treaty arbitrations. Among them are rather new issues about the difference between treaty claims and contract claims which are closely linked with umbrella clauses in international investment treaties. States have been decided responsible for internationally wrongful acts done to acquired rights based on concession agreements under the principle of state responsibility under customary international law. As international investment disputes are increasingly raised before international arbitral tribunals, the issues on the protection of contractual rights are attracting greater attention around the world. In particular, it is fiercely debated in a treaty arbitration whether the rights of investors based on investment contracts are protected by umbrella clauses. Contract claims are normally dealt with by national courts or tribunals.
For the present, arbitral awards are showing different decisions on the effect of umbrella clauses in international investment treaty. It is most likely that close and detailed provisions can prevent uncertainties as to the effects of umbrella clauses on the contractual rights of investors.
It is well established international rules that the treaty rights of investors are protected by densely knitted networks of international treaties and customary international law. Investors are enjoying national treatment, most-favoured-nations treatment, and full compensation in the event of expropriation. They are entitled to initiate claims directly against host states through investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. Korea has negotiated and concluded more than 80 BITs, and ranks the second in Asian regions in terms of the numbers of BITs to which Korea is a party. Korea is also preparing for FTAs with various states.
Many controversial issues have been raised in international treaty arbitrations. Among them are rather new issues about the difference between treaty claims and contract claims which are closely linked with umbrella clauses in international investment treaties. States have been decided responsible for internationally wrongful acts done to acquired rights based on concession agreements under the principle of state responsibility under customary international law. As international investment disputes are increasingly raised before international arbitral tribunals, the issues on the protection of contractual rights are attracting greater attention around the world. In particular, it is fiercely debated in a treaty arbitration whether the rights of investors based on investment contracts are protected by umbrella clauses. Contract claims are normally dealt with by national courts or tribunals.
For the present, arbitral awards are showing different decisions on the effect of umbrella clauses in international investment treaty. It is most likely that close and detailed provisions can prevent uncertainties as to the effects of umbrella clauses on the contractual rights of investors.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국제투자의 범위
Ⅲ. 수용
Ⅳ. 포괄적 보호 조항 혹은 우산조항
Ⅴ. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국제투자법에서의 비국가행위자
서울국제법연구
2010 .12
-
The Protection Offered by “Umbrella Clauses” in Korean Investment Treaties
중재연구
2013 .01
-
국제투자조약상 포괄적 보호조항(Umbrella Clauses)의 해석에 관한 연구
중재연구
2009 .01
-
투자계약으로 투자보장협정상의 ISDS를 피할 수 있는가?
국제법학회논총
2012 .06
-
국제투자계약에 따른 위험대처 방안에 관한 연구- Umbrella Clause와 MIGA를 중심으로 -
중재연구
2008 .01
-
국제조세분쟁과 투자협정상 투자자 : 국가 중재에 관한 고찰
국제경제법연구
2012 .11
-
포괄적 보호조항의 적용범위에 관한 연구 : ICSID 중재사례를 중심으로
무역학회지
2016 .11
-
A Case Study on the Resolution of International Investment Disputes Caused by Aggravation of Political and Economic Situation of the Host State : Focusing on the case of CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Argentine Republic
무역상무연구
2007 .12
-
A Case Study on the Utilization of Umbrella Clauses in Investor-State Contract Disputes : Focusing on the Cases of SGS v. Pakistan and SGS v. Philippines
무역상무연구
2009 .12
-
Law and Practice of Investment Treaties, 2009
국제경제법연구
2010 .05
-
Does the Umbrella Clause Really Help? : A Critical View on the Umbrella Clause
법학논집
2011 .01
-
국제투자분쟁에서 중재판정시 투자조약의 해석과 적용에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2013 .08
-
해외투자에 관한 국제관습법규칙의 형성 : 양자투자조약규정을 중심으로
국제경제법연구
2006 .12
-
조약청구·계약청구의 구분과 국제투자중재
국제법학회논총
2018 .06
-
국제계약에서 투자가보호를 위한 최소보호요건에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2013 .05
-
역사적 관점에서 본 국제투자법
법학논총
2008 .08
-
國際投資仲裁上 公益保護와 透明性 提高에 관한 考察
국제법학회논총
2005 .08
-
國際資本移動의 法的 問題點과 規制方案
국제법학회논총
2003 .04
-
國際投資法에 있어서 “契約上 權利”의 收用 및 보호
법과정책
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018449421