지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to interpret Jacques Derrida’s and Giorgio Agamben’s ethical and political projects in terms of human/animal relations. They maintain that division of human/animal has been produced by operations of ‘conceptual machinery’ (Derrida) or ‘anthropological machinery’ (Agamben). In either case, the division has been established through the sacrifice of animals by the ‘particular’ species, humans. Conceptual and anthropological machinery has been instituted as the ‘sacrificial structure.’ Human/animal relations began with the ‘initial violence’ to animals. Derrida’s acknowledgment that sacrifice is inevitable in any case leads him to thinking about institutions founded on ‘the least violence.’ Agamben claims the necessity to sever any ‘nexus’ or ‘joint’ that links human/animal life to institutions based on sacrifice.
In Derrida, ‘re-founding’ or ‘inventing’ a new ‘least bad’ institution starts with the coming animal others. The coming others make the machinery ‘out of joint’ which will drive humans to ‘invent’ a ‘least bad law and politics.’ Thus arises inevitable negotiations between the coming others and the existing machinery. Derrida will wait for the others to come and after that he can try any new political projects. The problem in Derrida seems to be that coming others can be used to serve the existing machinery just by providing opportunities to make the machinery work more effectively, less violently. Derrida would not give up the idea of improvement with all his deconstructive strategies.
Agamben tries to just render any institutional divisions ‘in-opera-tive.’ By ‘severing the nexus’ in the machinery that has produced divisions, inclusion/exception, everything will return to its ‘original context’ in which no sacrificial exclusion was instituted. Instead of proposing any alternative institutions which will lead to the same stalemate as before, Agamben’s political action of ‘division of divisions’ is just to return everything to its original ‘free usage.’ Following Benjamin, Agamben believes a possibility of ‘happy life’ could arise from ‘free usage’ of things liberated from the machinery. The ‘coming community’ can start with the free and liberated things. Agamben’s project can open a totally revolutionary possibility.
In Derrida, ‘re-founding’ or ‘inventing’ a new ‘least bad’ institution starts with the coming animal others. The coming others make the machinery ‘out of joint’ which will drive humans to ‘invent’ a ‘least bad law and politics.’ Thus arises inevitable negotiations between the coming others and the existing machinery. Derrida will wait for the others to come and after that he can try any new political projects. The problem in Derrida seems to be that coming others can be used to serve the existing machinery just by providing opportunities to make the machinery work more effectively, less violently. Derrida would not give up the idea of improvement with all his deconstructive strategies.
Agamben tries to just render any institutional divisions ‘in-opera-tive.’ By ‘severing the nexus’ in the machinery that has produced divisions, inclusion/exception, everything will return to its ‘original context’ in which no sacrificial exclusion was instituted. Instead of proposing any alternative institutions which will lead to the same stalemate as before, Agamben’s political action of ‘division of divisions’ is just to return everything to its original ‘free usage.’ Following Benjamin, Agamben believes a possibility of ‘happy life’ could arise from ‘free usage’ of things liberated from the machinery. The ‘coming community’ can start with the free and liberated things. Agamben’s project can open a totally revolutionary possibility.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 구자광 / 2008 / ＂도래할 민주주의＂: 지젝 vs. 데리다 / 라깡과 현대정신분석 10 (2) : 7 ~ 26
2. [단행본] - 조르조 아감벤 / 2008 / 호모 사케르: 주권 권력과 벌거벗은 생명 / 새물결
3. [단행본] - Agamben, Giorgio / 1993 / The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt / U of Minnesota P
4. [단행본] - Agamben, Giorgio / 1998 / Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life / Stanford UP,
5. [단행본] - Agamben, Giorgio / 1995 / The Idea of Prose. Trans. Michael Sullivan and Sam Whitsitt / SUNY Press
2. [단행본] - 조르조 아감벤 / 2008 / 호모 사케르: 주권 권력과 벌거벗은 생명 / 새물결
3. [단행본] - Agamben, Giorgio / 1993 / The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt / U of Minnesota P
4. [단행본] - Agamben, Giorgio / 1998 / Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life / Stanford UP,
5. [단행본] - Agamben, Giorgio / 1995 / The Idea of Prose. Trans. Michael Sullivan and Sam Whitsitt / SUNY Press
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조르조 아감벤의 패러다임과 사용 개념에 대한 소고
서강인문논총
2016 .04
-
J. Derrida와 莊子
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1991 .12
-
데리다의 삶과 철학의 재조명 : 폭력론을 중심으로
인문과학
2011 .12
-
데리다의 텍스트
철학사상
2008 .02
-
Study of Messianic and Weak Politics in Giorgio Agamben’s Theory of Biopolitics
한국현대정신분석학회 학술발표대회 프로시딩
2013 .06
-
동물성과 정동: 베케트와 데리다
현대영미드라마
2020 .04
-
동물의 시선 : 포우의 ‘검은 고양이’와 데리다의 고양이
새한영어영문학
2013 .11
-
해체주의 해석학에 대한 비판적 고찰 : Jacques Derrida를 중심으로
복음과 실천
2017 .09
-
Little Animal
Korea Journal
1963 .02
-
사도 바울과 벤야민의 메시아주의, 그리고 아감벤의 ‘동시대성’
영어영문학21
2015 .01
-
데리다의 시원적 사유로서의 『발생의 문제』
철학사상
2020 .05
-
아동문학 속의 저항하는 동물들
18세기영문학
2008 .01
-
사막의 한 복판에서 꽃 피우기: 쿳시의 「마이클 K」와 아감벤의 “벌거벗은 생명”을 중심으로
영어영문학연구
2017 .01
-
데리다와 유대주의 - 어떤 호명의 경험으로부터 -
철학논집
2020 .01
-
나치 집단수용소와 생명정치-프리모 레비와 조르조 아감벤의 논의를 중심으로
대구사학
2010 .01
-
영미아동 환경문학에 나타난 인간과 동물
영어영문학연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-018652410