지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the invation war, Japanese Imperialism struggled to achieve the goal of expanding and reforming the so called Yen-Block. Minami Giro, the government general of Chosun, proposed ‘the Unity in Japan and Chosun’ to link Japan and Chosun and ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ to link Chosun and Manchuria. The latter was devised before the establishment of the government of Manchuria. Subsequent to the initiate of ‘the Unity in Japan and Chosun', Chosun and Manchukuo could keep a increased mutual cooperation for the ‘Invasion to the Continent’.
Japanese Imperialism attempted to generalize the cognition to connect Chosun and Manchuria as one unity through the united historical view of both countries and Chosun-Manchuria tourism by railway. Moreover, after establishing the government of Manchuria, Japanese imperialism endeavored to active interchange between Chosun and Manchukuo. The officers of Chosun and Manchukuo kept close relationship for the immigration of Chosun people to Manchuria. The notion of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was intuited on the sequence of current flow. At the beginning it was initiated by Minami Giro for the completion of the blockenclosing between Japan and Manchukuo as well as Chosun and Manchukuo.
The high officers of the government general in Chosun visited Manchukuo for the consultation and the high officers of Manchukuo also visited Chosun to consult for the current issues, which was evaluated to bring a satisfactory result. The idea of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was enlarged to the ‘Unity in Continent’. The joint common destiny of the Chosun and Manchukuo was empathized on the aspect of industry and economy, to say nothing of politic and military
The thought of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was suggested at the point in time for the Japanese Imperialism to attack the Continent, which commence the close collaboration and transaction. The trade of Chosun to Manchukuo inclined to increase continuously. In the May in 1944 the tariff was abolished thoroughly. The Chosun people who immigrated to Manchuria were apprised as spearheads of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’. Japan, Chosun and Manchukuo cooperated more intimately for the immigration.
The conception of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was born for the matured mutual association of Chosun and Manchuria and its settlement was a triumph of the Japanese goal. Although various political powers opposed and conflicted, the shared goal of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ could be an example of collaboration for a goal. Several Chosun people had a vision to succeed in their business through investing in Manchuria when the idea of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was introduced. However, it was a delusion. No stake were prepared for almost all Chosun people.
Japanese Imperialism attempted to generalize the cognition to connect Chosun and Manchuria as one unity through the united historical view of both countries and Chosun-Manchuria tourism by railway. Moreover, after establishing the government of Manchuria, Japanese imperialism endeavored to active interchange between Chosun and Manchukuo. The officers of Chosun and Manchukuo kept close relationship for the immigration of Chosun people to Manchuria. The notion of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was intuited on the sequence of current flow. At the beginning it was initiated by Minami Giro for the completion of the blockenclosing between Japan and Manchukuo as well as Chosun and Manchukuo.
The high officers of the government general in Chosun visited Manchukuo for the consultation and the high officers of Manchukuo also visited Chosun to consult for the current issues, which was evaluated to bring a satisfactory result. The idea of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was enlarged to the ‘Unity in Continent’. The joint common destiny of the Chosun and Manchukuo was empathized on the aspect of industry and economy, to say nothing of politic and military
The thought of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was suggested at the point in time for the Japanese Imperialism to attack the Continent, which commence the close collaboration and transaction. The trade of Chosun to Manchukuo inclined to increase continuously. In the May in 1944 the tariff was abolished thoroughly. The Chosun people who immigrated to Manchuria were apprised as spearheads of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’. Japan, Chosun and Manchukuo cooperated more intimately for the immigration.
The conception of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was born for the matured mutual association of Chosun and Manchuria and its settlement was a triumph of the Japanese goal. Although various political powers opposed and conflicted, the shared goal of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ could be an example of collaboration for a goal. Several Chosun people had a vision to succeed in their business through investing in Manchuria when the idea of ‘the Unity in Chosun and Manchuria’ was introduced. However, it was a delusion. No stake were prepared for almost all Chosun people.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. ‘鮮滿一如論’의 형성 배경
Ⅲ. ‘선만일여론’의 제기와 ‘선만관계’
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일제하 동북아 관세문제와 조선의 대‘중국’ 무역
한국사연구
2013 .03
-
한말 · 일제하 한국인의 만주 인식
동방학지
2008 .01
-
식민지 공업화 문제의 연구사
인문학논총
2001 .08
-
帝国日本の文化権力: 1910年代京城の能と謡
일본연구
2014 .08
-
일제시기 ‘만주’ 개념의 역사성과 부정성
석당논총
2010 .01
-
김교신의 조선산 기독교에 대한 역사적 이해 : 조선혼과 조선심을 중심으로
한국기독교와 역사
2017 .09
-
1920년 전후 조선 상업회의소와 조선 산업정책의 확립
역사와경계
2006 .03
-
1910년대 '朝鮮貴族'의 實態―『每日申報』 기사를 중심으로―
사학연구
2004 .12
-
만주사변 이후 화교배척과 조선 민족주의 운동
중국근현대사연구
2014 .09
-
도한 일본인의 일상과 식민지 ‘조선’의 생성 : 잡지 『조선(朝鮮)』 문예란을 중심으로
아시아문화연구
2010 .09
-
조선철도에 대한 滿鐵 위탁경영과 총독부 直營으로의 환원 과정 및 배경
한국사학보
2015 .08
-
태평양전쟁기 조선총독부의 국책조선소 건설추진과 그 귀결 : 朝鮮造船工業株式會社의 사례
한국사연구
2008 .12
-
조선시, 전통, 시조 －조선시 구상과 국민문학, 국문학 개념의 탄생－
국어국문학
2003 .12
-
서양인의 조선여행 기록문을 통한 근대 식생활사(食生活史) 연구
한국식생활문화학회지
2016 .01
-
창과 방패의 딜레마: 1929년 제3회 IPR회의의 만주 논쟁
중국사연구
2015 .01
-
滿洲事變 前後 在滿朝鮮人 問題와 그들의 困境
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2001 .06
-
일제말기 김남천 문학과 만주- 미지와 공백의 기표
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
日帝 强占期 朝鮮 民俗調査 事業에 관한 硏究 : 아키바 다카시의 調査와 硏究를 中心으로 한 考察
동아인문학
2010 .06
-
조선(朝鮮) 통신사(通信使)를 포함한 한(韓).일(日) 관계에서의 음식문화(飮食文化) 교류 - 3. 조선통신사(朝鮮通信使) 파견과 일본(日本)의 조선통신사 접대 -
한국식생활문화학회지
1998 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
金容燮의 原蓄論과 社會經濟史學의 전개 : 《朝鮮後期農業史硏究ⅠㆍⅡ》를 중심으로
鄭勝振
한국사연구
2009
.12
일제하 동북아 관세문제와 조선의 대‘중국’ 무역
송규진
한국사연구
2013
.03
‘내재적 발전론’ 역사인식의 궤적과 전망
이영호
한국사연구
2011
.03
자본주의 맹아론과 조선후기 상업 변동 : 강만길 《朝鮮後期 商業資本의 發達》을 중심으로
고동환
한국사연구
2009
.12
조선후기 內的 發展과정 연구와 중세사회 解體論의 동거 : 《朝鮮後期農業史硏究[Ⅰ]-農村經濟･社會變動-》, 《朝鮮後期農業史硏究[Ⅱ]-農業變動ㆍ農學思潮-》
염정섭
한국사연구
2009
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018887271