지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One of the characteristics of post-modern society is to compose the by-self selection and mixture among the various element of identity rather than doing it by authority or repression. In order to comply with these social changes and for the education of history which might lead the changes, I suggest gender history.
The gender identity, which is a very important element that affects the formation of self-identity, has almost never been considered in history education so far. With the influence of feminism, we began to recognize that the awareness of gender influences on all aspects of human life which comes with various metamorphosis process on time and space up to now. The results of that awareness are verified in the history of woman and the history of gender.
Although the research of the women’s history for the confirmation of women's subjective identity enabled the expansion of history perception via the research of women’s own experience and socioeconomic status, it did not answer the question of why women’s experience and discrimination went that long. In the mean time, under the influence of postmodernism, we became to reach the recognition that human identity is being composed by influence of structured gender awareness. In other words, the problem of gender is not merely women's own but participates in all the aspects of human life as discoursed structure.
Joan W. Scott, the pioneer of the gender history, showed that the subject is being composed by both structure and subjective will. For history education, if we sort out the contents on her research, there are the gender as the subject category and the gender as the analysis method. The former which refers to gender, includes genders’ experience, system, ideology, power structure, etc. The latter regards the gender as an analysis category when it comes to the interpretation of history. It includes the significance of the change and progression as well as the gender analysis of revolutions and wars.
In history education which includes gender history as a curriculum contents, for the construction of gender identity, there is a structural characteristic in which gender's experience and consciousness are historically changed with its diversity. Students would recognize his/her-self as an object of change by discourses and as a positive subject agent. History education with the gender history is educational in that it issues not only the gender’s experience but questions about the elements which produce discrepancy between genders’ experiences. As a result, students shall have chance of self-reflection.
In this work, I suggested the necessity of history education for the consciousness of gender identity. From now on, the researches which verifies the relationship between historical perception and growth to an affirmative self-identity of student must be continued in line with development of teaching materials and practice in the class.
The gender identity, which is a very important element that affects the formation of self-identity, has almost never been considered in history education so far. With the influence of feminism, we began to recognize that the awareness of gender influences on all aspects of human life which comes with various metamorphosis process on time and space up to now. The results of that awareness are verified in the history of woman and the history of gender.
Although the research of the women’s history for the confirmation of women's subjective identity enabled the expansion of history perception via the research of women’s own experience and socioeconomic status, it did not answer the question of why women’s experience and discrimination went that long. In the mean time, under the influence of postmodernism, we became to reach the recognition that human identity is being composed by influence of structured gender awareness. In other words, the problem of gender is not merely women's own but participates in all the aspects of human life as discoursed structure.
Joan W. Scott, the pioneer of the gender history, showed that the subject is being composed by both structure and subjective will. For history education, if we sort out the contents on her research, there are the gender as the subject category and the gender as the analysis method. The former which refers to gender, includes genders’ experience, system, ideology, power structure, etc. The latter regards the gender as an analysis category when it comes to the interpretation of history. It includes the significance of the change and progression as well as the gender analysis of revolutions and wars.
In history education which includes gender history as a curriculum contents, for the construction of gender identity, there is a structural characteristic in which gender's experience and consciousness are historically changed with its diversity. Students would recognize his/her-self as an object of change by discourses and as a positive subject agent. History education with the gender history is educational in that it issues not only the gender’s experience but questions about the elements which produce discrepancy between genders’ experiences. As a result, students shall have chance of self-reflection.
In this work, I suggested the necessity of history education for the consciousness of gender identity. From now on, the researches which verifies the relationship between historical perception and growth to an affirmative self-identity of student must be continued in line with development of teaching materials and practice in the class.
목차
1. 들어가는 글
2. 역사교육 내용으로서 여성사와 젠더사
3. 자기인식으로서 역사교육을 위한 젠더사
4. 나가는 말
참고문헌 (99)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이성숙 / 2005 / 광복 60년, 여성 섹슈얼리티와 성 담론의 변화 / 여성과 역사 (3) : 115 ~ 143
2. [단행본] - Anne Cranny-Francis / 2003 / Gender Studies : Terms and Debates / Palgrave Macmillan
3. [단행본] - 조앤 스코트 / 2006 / 페미니즘 위대한 역설 : 프랑스 여성 참정권 투쟁이 던진 세 가지 쟁점, 여성·개인·시민 / 앨피
4. [단행본] - 거다 러너 / 1998 / 역사 속의 페미니스트 / 평민사
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 노성숙 / 2005 / 포스트모더니티와 여성주의에서 본 젠더와 정체성 / 인간연구 31 (8) : 5 ~ 39
2. [단행본] - Anne Cranny-Francis / 2003 / Gender Studies : Terms and Debates / Palgrave Macmillan
3. [단행본] - 조앤 스코트 / 2006 / 페미니즘 위대한 역설 : 프랑스 여성 참정권 투쟁이 던진 세 가지 쟁점, 여성·개인·시민 / 앨피
4. [단행본] - 거다 러너 / 1998 / 역사 속의 페미니스트 / 평민사
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 노성숙 / 2005 / 포스트모더니티와 여성주의에서 본 젠더와 정체성 / 인간연구 31 (8) : 5 ~ 39
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
好意伝達表現の男女差に関する考察 -告白場面に見られる発話機能を中心に-
일본문화학보
2020 .08
-
역사교육에서 내용 선정 및 구성의 개념으로서 성별
역사교육
2007 .06
-
A Review of the Notion of Social Construction of Gender from a Sociolinguistic Perspective
언어과학연구
2019 .03
-
여성사 교육, 왜 무엇을 가르칠 것인가
역사교육
2002 .03
-
러시아사회에서 젠더적 요소로서의 여성성 문제 연구
슬라브학보
2010 .03
-
미디어 속의 여성 : TV광고를 통해 본 수행적 젠더성
비평문학
2009 .06
-
오늘날, 여성사란 무엇인가
여성과역사
2007 .01
-
한국교회에서 양성평등 실현을 위한 기독교교육의 과제
한국기독교신학논총
2009 .01
-
‘여성사 쓰기’에 대한 (재)성찰
역사교육
2007 .06
-
성별의 언어적 구조
언어과학연구
2011 .12
-
Male Heroines and Female Masters: Reconstructing Gender through Cross-gender Acting in Trans-Twelfth Night
Shakespeare Review
2019 .09
-
젠더사의 정치학 : 딜레마와 가능성 : 조앤 스콧을 중심으로
역사와 세계
2008 .12
-
독일여성사 서술의 현황과 과제
여성과역사
2014 .01
-
한국 근대 여성사 연구의 현황과 전망, 2007～2013
여성과역사
2013 .01
-
한국의 여성정책: 쟁점과 경험적 함의
민족연구
2011 .01
-
UN 젠더 주류화 20년과 한국: 거버넌스적 조망
민족연구
2015 .01
-
남성, 남성성, 페미니스트 이론
영미문학페미니즘
2009 .01
-
사라진 여성해방: 신전통주의 러시아 사회에서 여성의 일과 삶의 변화
러시아어문학연구논집
2017 .01
-
역사교육의 담론과 학문적 가능성
역사교육
2006 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-374-001676488