지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 2 (154page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The last two decades have seen increasing awareness of the relevance of victims' interests to the criminal justice system. The revival of interest in victims of crime during the 1970s and 1980s has resulted in various reforms to alleviate the problems for victims resulting from crime and from encounter with the criminal justice system. The most recent reforms have centered on the integration of victims in the criminal justice process, in an attempt to reduce their feelings of alienation and perceptions of injustice.
In the adversary criminal procedure such as Korean criminal procedure, one of the ordinary popular remedies in an attempt to guarantee the right and legal status of crime victim in criminal justice process has been introduction of Victim Impact Statement at the defendant’s sentencing hearing.
In general, Victim Impact Statement allows the victim or the victim’s family to describe the harm suffered as a consequence of the defendant’s actions. It may detail the physical, psychological, and economic impact of the offense on the victim or survivors, the victim’s or survivors’ opinions about the crime and the offender, and, in murder cases, information about the personal qualities of the deceased.
This study 1) examines the development of the concept and various forms of victim impact statement, 2) reviews constitutional, penological, and practical problems and arguments regarding introduction of victim impact statement in adversary criminal procedures, examining what was historical backgrounds of its introduction and institutionalization and the pros and cons on it, 3) studies legislations and practical operating system of Victim Impact Statement in the U. S. A, Canada, England, and Japan by comparative methods, 4) presents the empirical research results classified by crime victim's participation rate, the perception of victim and criminal justice officers (judge, prosecutor, probation etc.), impact of Victim Impact Statement on sentence results and victim's satisfaction to examine its practice and effectiveness, and 5) diagnoses the suitability and limitation of introduction of Victim Impact Statement into Korean criminal procedures and suggests the concrete methods to apply.
In the adversary criminal procedure such as Korean criminal procedure, one of the ordinary popular remedies in an attempt to guarantee the right and legal status of crime victim in criminal justice process has been introduction of Victim Impact Statement at the defendant’s sentencing hearing.
In general, Victim Impact Statement allows the victim or the victim’s family to describe the harm suffered as a consequence of the defendant’s actions. It may detail the physical, psychological, and economic impact of the offense on the victim or survivors, the victim’s or survivors’ opinions about the crime and the offender, and, in murder cases, information about the personal qualities of the deceased.
This study 1) examines the development of the concept and various forms of victim impact statement, 2) reviews constitutional, penological, and practical problems and arguments regarding introduction of victim impact statement in adversary criminal procedures, examining what was historical backgrounds of its introduction and institutionalization and the pros and cons on it, 3) studies legislations and practical operating system of Victim Impact Statement in the U. S. A, Canada, England, and Japan by comparative methods, 4) presents the empirical research results classified by crime victim's participation rate, the perception of victim and criminal justice officers (judge, prosecutor, probation etc.), impact of Victim Impact Statement on sentence results and victim's satisfaction to examine its practice and effectiveness, and 5) diagnoses the suitability and limitation of introduction of Victim Impact Statement into Korean criminal procedures and suggests the concrete methods to apply.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 피해자의견진술제도에 대한 일반적 고찰
제3장 각국의 피해자의견진술제도
제4장 피해자의견진술제도에 대한 평가연구 결과와 함의
제5장 피해자의견진술권 강화를 위한 정책제언
제6장 요약 및 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
형사사법절차에의 범죄피해자 참여제도실효화 방안
피해자학연구
2013 .01
-
범죄 피해자의 형사재판 참가에 관한 논의와 쟁점
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
형사피해자의 재판절차진술권에 관한 연구 - 형사소송규칙의 문제점과 피해자진술의 내용을 중심으로 -
피해자학연구
2019 .01
-
형사재판절차에서의 범죄피해자참가제도의 도입 방안
피해자학연구
2010 .01
-
일본경찰의 범죄피해자 지원제도
피해자학연구
2004 .01
-
피해자의 재판절차진술권에 관한 연구: 미국 연방사형재판에서 피해자영향증거를 중심으로
피해자학연구
2012 .01
-
범죄피해자 보호지원강화를 위한 종합대책
피해자학연구
2005 .01
-
공판절차에서 피해자의 지위에 관한 비교법적 고찰
피해자학연구
2012 .01
-
형법에 있어서 피해자측면에 관한 연구
법학연구
2007 .06
-
고소권자로서 피해자의 범위와 역할
형사법연구
2010 .01
-
양형절차에서 피해자 진술권의 역할 -형사소송법 제294조의 2를 중심으로-
피해자학연구
2013 .01
-
범죄피해자의 양형절차에의 참가
형사법연구
2009 .01
-
피해자관련 요인과 양형: 폭력범을 중심으로
피해자학연구
2009 .01
-
｢피해자참가인제도｣의 도입논의에 관한 고찰 - 한국형사법학회(시안) vs 법무부(안)의 비교분석을 중심으로 -
형사법연구
2010 .01
-
경찰의 범죄피해자 보호 실태와 대책에 관한 연구
한양법학
2011 .11
-
경찰수사단계에서의 피해자 보호
법학연구
2007 .06
-
범죄 피해자에 대한 지원의 심리학적 측면
피해자학연구
2010 .01
-
형사절차에서 피해자의 정보제공에 관한 연구
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
공판단계에서 피해자의 진술권 강화방안 : 일본의 의견진술제도를 중심으로
법학연구
2010 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-364-002071276