지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study was carried out with the objective of investigating the common and different features between native speakers of Japanese and Korean. Through researching the actual usage conditions of location indicators (ko, so, a), the common and different features were investigated through comparing the awareness of understanding and actual usage of location indicators between speakers of both languages.
The survey was carried out both in Korean and Japanese and answered by 100 people respectively. The people taking the survey had three choices "ko," "so," "a" to choose for each question. Based on all categories and hypothesis, analysis of the differences were compared. Furthermore, an overall examination of the patterns of fusion of visible objects of indication and invisible objects of indication was conducted.
As a result, in the overall pattern of fusion for location indicators, native speakers of Korean had a tendency to have a further sense of object indication; however, native speakers of Japanese in the same situation had a tendency to sense the same object indications in a more spatial and physical way. Especially for visible patterns of fusion of object indication, when compared to invisible object indication, the difference between the usage of object indicators clearly appears between the Korean language and Japanese language; so, it can be said that special attention must be payed when teaching the usage of object indication to native speakers of Korean who are learning Japanese. For mid-distance patterns of fusion, when referring to an actual object (a tangible object/thing), the appearance of "so" was apparent in native speakers of Japanese. In comparison, for people that appear on television or in movies, reminiscing about the past, and conjectures (intangible objects/things), it was found that the appearance of "so" is scarce. As for native speakers of Korean, preceeding studies denied the usage of patterns of fusion of "so" for mid-distance situations; however, through this study, it was found that patterns of fusions of "so" can also be used when referring to mid-distance objects. Moreover, it can also said that "so" appears frequently when indicating especially familiar objects (one's possessions).
The survey was carried out both in Korean and Japanese and answered by 100 people respectively. The people taking the survey had three choices "ko," "so," "a" to choose for each question. Based on all categories and hypothesis, analysis of the differences were compared. Furthermore, an overall examination of the patterns of fusion of visible objects of indication and invisible objects of indication was conducted.
As a result, in the overall pattern of fusion for location indicators, native speakers of Korean had a tendency to have a further sense of object indication; however, native speakers of Japanese in the same situation had a tendency to sense the same object indications in a more spatial and physical way. Especially for visible patterns of fusion of object indication, when compared to invisible object indication, the difference between the usage of object indicators clearly appears between the Korean language and Japanese language; so, it can be said that special attention must be payed when teaching the usage of object indication to native speakers of Korean who are learning Japanese. For mid-distance patterns of fusion, when referring to an actual object (a tangible object/thing), the appearance of "so" was apparent in native speakers of Japanese. In comparison, for people that appear on television or in movies, reminiscing about the past, and conjectures (intangible objects/things), it was found that the appearance of "so" is scarce. As for native speakers of Korean, preceeding studies denied the usage of patterns of fusion of "so" for mid-distance situations; however, through this study, it was found that patterns of fusions of "so" can also be used when referring to mid-distance objects. Moreover, it can also said that "so" appears frequently when indicating especially familiar objects (one's possessions).
목차
〈要旨〉
1. ?究の背景と目的
2. 先行?究と本?究の位置づけ
3. ?究方法
4. 分析結果及び考察
5. 融合型全?から見る韓日母語話者の相違
6. まとめと日本語?育への提案
參考文獻
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
근대의 대중매체 속에 투영된 여성과 여성다움
韓國古典硏究
2008 .01
-
Two Types of Object and Object Shift
생성문법연구
2003 .01
-
When and How native speakers of English use "thanks" and "thank you"
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2011 .06
-
The Descriptions of Relative Locations between Two Objects : With Focus on Figure`s Orientation and Animacy
언어과학연구
2015 .12
-
陽村 權近의 詠物詩 類型 探討
어문학
2005 .09
-
｢삼장가타｣에 대한 규기의 해석
인도철학
2012 .01
-
言い間違いに関する日本語母語話者間のフィードバックについて
일본문화학보
2007 .02
-
‘대상’ 개념에 대한 비판적 일고찰
인문언어
2011 .01
-
'What is said' and speaker's meaning
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2006 .12
-
한중일 의뢰행동에서의 ‘정보제공’의 실태연구 : 대학생의 ‘모어장면’과 ‘접촉장면’의 비교
일본문화연구
2014 .07
-
반응발화에서 나타나는 장음화 현상 : 한국인 중국어 화자를 중심으로
담화와인지
2016 .11
-
한국인과 원어민 영어 발화의 F0 고저 범위 차이와 발음 평가에 있어서 그 역할
음성과학
2003 .12
-
The Use of F0 in Segmental and Suprasegmental Realization of English Targets by Native Speakers and Korean Learners
언어과학
2012 .01
-
Native Speaker : 정체성과 언어의 문제
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2010 .12
-
韓国人大学生の謝罪行為について : 友人同士と日本大学生との接触場面を中心に
국제언어문학
2013 .10
-
Language Modeling of English Texts Written by Non-native Speakers
한국사전학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2017 .02
-
영어의 이중목적어구문 소고
새한영어영문학
2013 .02
-
ディスカッション場面における共感要求表明の日韓対照研究
일어일문학
2019 .11
-
현대중국어 보어와 목적어 어순 유형 분류 및 특징 분석
언어와 정보사회
2020 .01
-
‘賓語를 대동한 動詞被字句’를 형성하는 條件과 이에 부합하는 賓語類型
중국어문학논집
2017 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-730-002649914