메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
현대미술사학회 현대미술사연구 현대미술사연구 제26집
발행연도
2009.12
수록면
365 - 393 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Andy Warhol’s legacy and the so-called ‘Warhol effect’ have not faded even though his artistic reputation has drifted in the limbo between good and bad for more than two decades. That is mainly because of his repetitive late works and business-minded art productions in addition to the political and moral ‘indifference’ that cancelling out the achievement of early works. But since the opening of the ‘time capsules’ at The Andy Warhol Museum in Pittsburgh, Warhol scholarship and exhibitions began incorporating and extending to his ‘business art’ and venturing into the culture industry. This new tendency focusing on his ‘extra-art’ works and visual culture as a whole is important to overall evaluation of him.
Fashion and TV show are two ‘extra-art’ areas Warhol devoted his time from the 1970s until his death, when the critical opinions were mostly negative and scarce and he needed a breakthrough. Although fashion was his lifelong passion, he described his part as ‘reflection’ since he was not a designer or maker, nor did he make profit from it. He was involved in fashion since the ‘Youthquake’ in the 60s when he was closely associated with Paraphernalia, the most experimental and ‘pop’ fashion boutique in New York. Iin the 70s, he moved to the high fashion and befriended with the world famous designers appeared in his magazine Interview, but his real contribution to fashion is through his modeling job in the 80s. He became the professional model for Zoli and Ford, and produced a lot of fashion photos but his poses were deliberately awkward and stiff and even ‘feminine.’ By acting the unconventional poses, he seems to test the myth of genuine masculinity and to prove the fact that all poses are performance. As a result, these ambivalent photos can be compared to Cindy Sherman’s rather direct ‘anti-fashion’ photos.
TV was Warhol’s favorite passtime and he really wished to be a famous TV star to be broadcasted to every home. He produced several cable TV shows resembling Interview casting with fashion stars, artists, and the celebrities, but they were neglected by people. Even though his trial was not successful, he intervened the one-way network system and showed artist-produced entertainment programs and made some noise. This kind of Warhol’s effort is currently revaluated by the exhibition 「Pop Life : Art in a Material World」, participated by Jeff Koons, Murakami Takashi, Keith Haring, Richard Prince, Damian Hirst, and Tracey Emin, etc. These successful artists followed Warhol’s path and exceeded him in many ways, and their business-minded arts are the proof of Warhol’s foresight in terms of art and commerce. Whether we approve or not, art can not ignore today’s material visual culture and this is why we should stop evaluating Warhol by the qualifiers such as the good, the bad, or even the indifferent.

목차

1. 워홀의 프론티어
2. 패션
3. TV
4. 좋은놈, 나쁜놈, 무심한놈
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-609-002304152