지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Korean manuscripts are a meaningful language research materials in the 17th~19th century. There have been many recent achievements in this part that are connected with Korean manuscripts, except research about a miswriting. A miswriting has been thought to be fragmentary and unconnected data caused by writer’s error.
The purpose of this study focuses on analyzing the examples of miswriting of Korean culinary manuscripts, and to classifying those types by cause of miswriting. According to the writer's mistakes and language recognition, a miswriting is divided by a multiplicity of subdivision.
The results of this research can be summarized as follows : There are many types of miswriting caused by writer’s involuntariness, which is several stroke omission or character, a syllable repetition and grammatical misconception. And then there are some types of miswriting caused by writer’s language misrecognition, which is a phoneme misrecognition, reflections of popular pronunciation or writer’s linguistic habits.
A miswriting is not a data of a slight slip that could be occur in the transcription processes, but a meaningful data that could be show writer’s language recognition. An analysis of miswriting types will make a understanding about the transcription processes in the Korean manuscripts.
The purpose of this study focuses on analyzing the examples of miswriting of Korean culinary manuscripts, and to classifying those types by cause of miswriting. According to the writer's mistakes and language recognition, a miswriting is divided by a multiplicity of subdivision.
The results of this research can be summarized as follows : There are many types of miswriting caused by writer’s involuntariness, which is several stroke omission or character, a syllable repetition and grammatical misconception. And then there are some types of miswriting caused by writer’s language misrecognition, which is a phoneme misrecognition, reflections of popular pronunciation or writer’s linguistic habits.
A miswriting is not a data of a slight slip that could be occur in the transcription processes, but a meaningful data that could be show writer’s language recognition. An analysis of miswriting types will make a understanding about the transcription processes in the Korean manuscripts.
목차
1. 서론
2. 연구의 내용과 방법
3. 원인별 오기 유형화
4. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한문 자료의 오류 문제-제7차 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 국어`문학 교과서를 중심으로
漢文敎育論集
2005 .01
-
古文書에 사용된 종이 연구 - 『度支準折』을 중심으로-
古文書硏究
2004 .01
-
고종조 1893 세계박람회에 대한 기술상 오류문제에 관한 연구
한국사상과 문화
2005 .01
-
인도어 사본 연구 현황과 과제: 국내학계를 중심으로
불교학연구
2019 .01
-
韓國國學振興院의 古文書 수집·정리의 실제와 과제
古文書硏究
2007 .01
-
새 자료 번역필사본 『망남□』에 대하여
중국어문학논집
2019 .10
-
東アジアの書籍文化 - 様式の比較から -
동서인문학
2019 .08
-
초기 우리말 성서의 저본 사용에 대한 통시적 연구 : 마태복음을 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2017 .10
-
동남아시아의 빨리어(Pāli) 문자와 불교사본
인도철학
2014 .01
-
우리나라 최초의 고문서 수집 · 정리
古文書硏究
2007 .01
-
강원지역 고문서 조사⋅정리의 현황과 과제
태동고전연구
2019 .01
-
梵･藏･돈황본 『금강경』 대조 연구
인도철학
2009 .01
-
An L2 Writer's Development Over Time
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2011 .10
-
The Making of the Korean Language
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
<闡義昭鑑諺解> 목판본과 필사본 간의 문체론적 특징 고찰
동양고전연구
2018 .01
-
[기획논문] 매뉴스크립(Manuscripts) 기록물 분류체계에 관한 연구
역사연구
2003 .12
-
From manuscript to hypertext : Shakespeare and the media of performance
Shakespeare Review
2002 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-810-002143821