메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박균성 (경희대학교) 김재광 (선문대학교)
저널정보
행정법이론실무학회 행정법연구 行政法硏究 第26號
발행연도
2010.4
수록면
33 - 57 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The legal fiction system of authorization and permission has played an important role to enhance competitiveness of private sector through simplified process relieving the burden of businessmen(applicants) and speeding the process up and could be said as appropriate system in contemporary needs of deregulation. But it is not established in legal theory completely.
Therefore, we need to review the legal fiction of authorization and permission in terms of legal theory. : the differences between the legal fiction system of authorization and permission and concentrated force(Konzentrationswirkung) in the german legal system, the basis and the object of legal fiction of authorization and permission, the application to authorization and permission etc. and the submission of attached documents, the legal nature of consultation with relevant agency on licensing, the concentration level of licensing procedures, decision method of licensing requirements, and the system of first-admission and later-consultation(licensing in part) etc.
And in this article, I tried to show the problems of system on licensing fictionalized legally : unbridled spreading in accordance with the principle absence of introducing the legal fiction on authorization and permission, obscuring in that system, practical using of it, conferring with agencies taking charge of licensing fictionalized legally, requiring package documents and first-admission and later consultation(licensing in part). In addition, I have brought recommendations to improve that system : introducing 7 principles for that licensing system, enhancing plan for making it's process transparent(adopting notice of that licensing system, representing its requirements and authorization and permission legally fictionalized clearly), promoting the convenience for applicant (to introduce part-licensing system and pre-decision, to submit documents step by step for each progress, to give a right of claim on making a measure's standards and asking a explanation of it, to join the process for relevant applicant in licensing step, and to represent notice system of required documents for licensing, including licensing standards in the table of civil petition treatment), reducing the time for authorization and permission(to organize the licensing council such as Package Council for Complex Civil Petition on Construction(Building Act, Article12), to represent the period for asking cooperation and regulations fictionalized legally without opinions in the law of legal fiction), de-regulating the standards of authorization and permission, improving of licensing process etc.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 인ㆍ허가의제제도에 대한 법이론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 인ㆍ허가 의제제도의 문제점
Ⅳ. 인ㆍ허가 의제제도의 개선방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (2)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-363-002941945