메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Eun-Mi Kim (충북대학교)
저널정보
한국관세학회 관세학회지 關稅學會誌 第10卷 第2號
발행연도
2009.5
수록면
243 - 273 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
According to several studies, a conflict exists between CBD and TRIPs with regard to ABS, as the two regimes operate under different assumptions with regard to property rights pertaining to genetic resources- and hence, essentially pursue different objectives. This study tries to examine the argument for the contradictions between the CBD and TRIPs, and explore alternative actions that could resolve the conflicts between IPRs and protection of biodiversity. For that this paper analyzes their legal provisions and historical evidences in terms of international political economic perspective. Why are they in tension? Could this tension be feasibly compatible? Is there any tactic by which the struggle might be settled? This study supports the argument by asserting that the contradiction between the two treaties is too deep to be unraveled because: each treaty is supported by fundamentally different stake holders; accordingly, the two treaties contain distinctly different content; moreover, each party is equipped with asymmetrical bargaining power. In an effort to help lessen the conflicts between IPRs and ABS, this article posits bilateral negotiation rather than multilateral agreement as a possible alternative regime. But the bilateral negotiation should be different from TRIPs-plus which is biased for developed countries.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. International legal frameworks for biodiversity
Ⅲ. Relations between CBD and TRIPs
Ⅳ. Bilateral Agreement
Ⅴ. Concluding Remarks
Bibliography

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002967477