메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역학회 무역학회지 貿易學會誌 第28卷 第5號
발행연도
2003.12
수록면
439 - 462 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
One of the more important issues facing current letter of credit practice is the effect of Non-documentary conditions. The recent non-documentary condition cases on the L/C transactions show that their method and skills become more and more intelligent and complicated. Non-documentary conditions practice defeat the underlying principle of the documentary credit itself and directly contradicts the wording of Articles 2, 4, and 5.
Despite of UCP 500's clear stipulation that non documentary condition should be disregarded, certain banks continue to issue documentary credits and amendments thereto which contain a non-documentary conditions. It is evident that such wrong practice is causing severe problems to all parties involved in documentary credit transactions. So, it will reduce the efficiency of documentary credit business.
The purpose of this article is to clarify how non-documentary conditions in letter of credit transactions should be interpreted and treated in letter of credit business based on recently, domestic courts' decisions to preserve the independence principle. I think surely that the non-documentary requirements are not inconsistent with the principle of party autonomy because the L/C transaction will operate efficiently and effectively only if the inference doctrine keeps intact. In the recent decision in relate to the non-documentary condition, domestic courts appear to be having interpreted narrowly UCP 500 Article 13(c). But these attempts are very dangerous to the letter of credit operation. Conclusively these conditions must be disregarded and treated them as if they were not stated for safeguard the independence principle.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 신용장에서 비서류적 조건의 적용범위와 양태
Ⅲ. 신용장관련규칙에서의 처리규정과 유효성 논쟁
Ⅳ. 유효성인정 판결의 제문제점과 합리적 해석
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002894219