지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The tombstone of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To is very important for interpretation of Eastern Asia at around A.D.400. It is true that a great deal of researches on this has been done since the tombstone was introduced for the first time up to present. The direction of the result of the research has been decided according to the profits of the nationalities of the researchers. Especially, Japan and Korea showed tremendous interests on this because they thought according to the interpretations described on the relationships between the two countries on the tombstone will determine the dominion of hegemony at around A.D.400 in Eastern Asia.
However, in this writing, I have put aside this point of an argument and emphasized purely on fresh historical investigation about the facts which were appeared on the tombstone. As a result, the two words, 'Chun-Je' and 'Hwang-Chun' which appear at the beginning of an inscription do not mean God but Royal Palace of Buyeo at that time instead. I think this interpretation will give us a chance to have a new idea about Buyeo different from what we used to think of.
This article is concerned about foreign conquest of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To, one of our prides of Han-Min-Jok. On Middle School Korean History textbooks and on General Introduction of Korean History, the conquered area by the Great King Kwang-Gae-To was written as 64 fortresses and 1400 villages. This was written based on the result of researches had been done in the past. But what I have found out was much more than this :- 128 fortresses, 3 counties and 2800 villages. The formers are obvious errors. Therefore, our academic society must correct these errors as soon as possible.
The writer has presented a few fresh ideas. I think these should be proven by the verification of my school fellows.
However, in this writing, I have put aside this point of an argument and emphasized purely on fresh historical investigation about the facts which were appeared on the tombstone. As a result, the two words, 'Chun-Je' and 'Hwang-Chun' which appear at the beginning of an inscription do not mean God but Royal Palace of Buyeo at that time instead. I think this interpretation will give us a chance to have a new idea about Buyeo different from what we used to think of.
This article is concerned about foreign conquest of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To, one of our prides of Han-Min-Jok. On Middle School Korean History textbooks and on General Introduction of Korean History, the conquered area by the Great King Kwang-Gae-To was written as 64 fortresses and 1400 villages. This was written based on the result of researches had been done in the past. But what I have found out was much more than this :- 128 fortresses, 3 counties and 2800 villages. The formers are obvious errors. Therefore, our academic society must correct these errors as soon as possible.
The writer has presented a few fresh ideas. I think these should be proven by the verification of my school fellows.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 문제 제기
Ⅲ. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Tombstone Without an Inscription
Korea Journal
1971 .05
-
後漢代 墓碑의 성행과 建安十年 禁碑令의 반포
동양사학연구
2013 .09
-
통일신라의 (陵)墓碑에 대한 몇 가지 논의
목간과문자
2012 .10
-
Tombstone and Butterfly etc.
Korea Journal
1990 .10
-
조선 초기 개성의 위상과 기능
역사와현실
2011 .03
-
백제 한성도읍기의 도성체계와 아차산성
史叢(사총)
2014 .01
-
四天王寺 出土 碑片의 形態學的 檢討
역사와경계
2012 .12
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
조선전기 축성기술의 변천 연구
인문과학연구
2017 .03
-
Eleven Poems of Jung Kwang
Korea Journal
1991 .12
-
총론 : 개경(개성) 연구의 새로운 모색 : 인적 네트워크와 경관
역사와현실
2011 .03
-
발해 거란도 노선 연구
고구려발해연구
2018 .03
-
最近 廣開土王陵碑 硏究의 動向과 그 論爭點 (1)
경주사학
1985 .12
-
금석문을 통해 본 6세기 신라 법제와 지방민 인식 변화
한국고대사연구
2019 .03
-
公州 茂城山城의 구조와 축조시기
역사와 담론
2012 .04
-
高句麗와 百濟의 城郭文化
고구려발해연구
2005 .09
-
조선시대 여성 묘비에 관한 일 고찰
한문학논집(漢文學論集)
2018 .01
-
조선후기 회화와 지도에 기록된 개성의 유적과 경관
역사와현실
2011 .03
-
京畿北部地域 高句麗 堡壘 考察
문화사학
2002 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002399632