메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.42 No.1
발행연도
2006.3
수록면
149 - 171 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay examines the extent to which Shakespeare and Derrida correspond to each other in the light of law. Both writers share the idea that the law is inaccessible and that justice is always to come. According to Derrida, the law is another name of difference, a key concept designating the condition of possibility of meaning, because it requires what he calls singular interpretation. One reads, understands, and experiences the law in his or her own way. Derrida takes this singular relationship to the law as a point of departure for his legal philosophy, and then he claims that there ought to be a clear distinction between law and justice. Given that justice is something that must be always right, general, and universal, one cannot say that the law of singularity is just in itself. The gap between law and justice is, however, not necessarily bad for Derrida because it paradoxically allows us to make our legal imagination anew with a view toward a better society. Like Derrida, Shakespeare in Measure for Measure also probes into the difference between law and justice by dramatizing various legal perspectives of his characters. He demonstrates the ways in which almost every character in the play takes different approaches to the law, depending on a particular condition or circumstance under which he or she is placed. Isabella, would-be nun, for instance, treats the law from a point of view which valorizes chastity over anything else whereas Angelo seeks to use the law for his political ambition and his sexual desire for her. Similarly, Claudio sees the law from his position of death row inmate, and Pompey deals with the law in accordance with his two different jobs, namely, bawd and assistant executioner. In other words, there is no general idea of law at Vienna, and those relative views or treatments of the law are seen to be a stumbling block to the establishment of justice. Shakespeare, however, suggests that justice may be possible, if all Viennese, by implication, all of us, treat the law in the position of other party, just as Barnardine and Elbow do so in the play by means of their creative legal imagination.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003100404