지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 729 - 761 (33page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Measure for Measure, the so-called "disguised ruler play", deals with the problem of the political authority of how to rule his people, focusing on the ruling method of the absolute monarch. With it, this play prepares the English society for accommodation to James' new ruling style, the form of exercising his authority, and his ruling method as well in the political situation at this transitional moment.
The citizens of Vienna are put under the experimental rules of extremely opposing methods-the Duke's generous rule and his substitute Angelo's rigid one. Like King James, the Duke's generous rule resulted in a social milieu in which the traditional regulations seem to be broken down and thus produced the anxiety that the social order and authority are fallen apart and therefore, can be subverted. However, Duke's substitute Angelo's extremely stem and rigid enforcement of the law and abuse of power inevitably creates the situation that requires Duke's rule. To the above mentioned anxiety that the generous monarch might incur, the Duke who regained his position displays that he himself is the ideal ruler by dialogically synthesizing the legal justice and Christian mercy. Eventually, this play provides the pardon and marriages as the results of both mercy and punishment through the ritual of public shame over which the duke presides, clearly opposed to the politics of romantic comedies that conclude with fictitious happy ending.
The more important theme of the political experiment of this play is concerned about how to embody his authority in himself as a monarch who possesses the absolute power, "like power divine." The Duke's purpose was to achieve the omnipotent knowledge and to exercise complete control over his people by demonstrating his ability to look into the secret inwardness of his people. In order to achieve his purpose, the Duke ensures the superiority of his sight by dramatically displaying himself as a source of power or disguising himself. In disguising as a friar he can peer into or eavesdrop subjects' inner world and the center of power from both inside and outside of his dukedom. These attempts of the Duke, as I mentioned in the beginning of this paper, was caused by the epistemological anxiety and pessimism on the disparity and unaccessibility of individual's inner self in the early modern England. This kind of pessimism, however, led the monarchs into a strong desire for consolidating reliable methods to overcome various kinds of impediments and inspired them to imitate the divine omnipotence, rather than dispirit them. The Duke expected to construct the metaphysical ground as the anointed or the earthly god in himself through the above mentioned strategies.
Nevertheless, the Duke's strategies themselves reveal his limitations as an absolute monarch and lead the people to question his power. Furthermore, not only Lucio's uncontained voice and his potential slander, but also Isabella's silence to the Duke's repeated proposal demonstrate that the Duke's absolute power is not complete itself but still requires to be complemented and correction, which directs the audience's eyes to King James.
The citizens of Vienna are put under the experimental rules of extremely opposing methods-the Duke's generous rule and his substitute Angelo's rigid one. Like King James, the Duke's generous rule resulted in a social milieu in which the traditional regulations seem to be broken down and thus produced the anxiety that the social order and authority are fallen apart and therefore, can be subverted. However, Duke's substitute Angelo's extremely stem and rigid enforcement of the law and abuse of power inevitably creates the situation that requires Duke's rule. To the above mentioned anxiety that the generous monarch might incur, the Duke who regained his position displays that he himself is the ideal ruler by dialogically synthesizing the legal justice and Christian mercy. Eventually, this play provides the pardon and marriages as the results of both mercy and punishment through the ritual of public shame over which the duke presides, clearly opposed to the politics of romantic comedies that conclude with fictitious happy ending.
The more important theme of the political experiment of this play is concerned about how to embody his authority in himself as a monarch who possesses the absolute power, "like power divine." The Duke's purpose was to achieve the omnipotent knowledge and to exercise complete control over his people by demonstrating his ability to look into the secret inwardness of his people. In order to achieve his purpose, the Duke ensures the superiority of his sight by dramatically displaying himself as a source of power or disguising himself. In disguising as a friar he can peer into or eavesdrop subjects' inner world and the center of power from both inside and outside of his dukedom. These attempts of the Duke, as I mentioned in the beginning of this paper, was caused by the epistemological anxiety and pessimism on the disparity and unaccessibility of individual's inner self in the early modern England. This kind of pessimism, however, led the monarchs into a strong desire for consolidating reliable methods to overcome various kinds of impediments and inspired them to imitate the divine omnipotence, rather than dispirit them. The Duke expected to construct the metaphysical ground as the anointed or the earthly god in himself through the above mentioned strategies.
Nevertheless, the Duke's strategies themselves reveal his limitations as an absolute monarch and lead the people to question his power. Furthermore, not only Lucio's uncontained voice and his potential slander, but also Isabella's silence to the Duke's repeated proposal demonstrate that the Duke's absolute power is not complete itself but still requires to be complemented and correction, which directs the audience's eyes to King James.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - Maurois, Andre / 1993 / 영국사 / 서울: 기린원
[단행본] - Foucault, Michel / 1994 / 감시와 처벌 / 서울: 나남출판
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Baines, Barbara / 1990 / Assaying the power of Chastity in Measure for Measure / Study of English Literature 30 : 283 ~ 301
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bradbrook, M. C / 1941 / Authority, Truth, and Justice in Measure for Measure / Review of English Studies 17 : 385 ~ 399
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Diehl, Huston / 1998 / Infinite Space: Representation and Performance in Measure for Measure / Shakespeare Quarterly 49 : 393 ~ 341
[단행본] - Foucault, Michel / 1994 / 감시와 처벌 / 서울: 나남출판
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Baines, Barbara / 1990 / Assaying the power of Chastity in Measure for Measure / Study of English Literature 30 : 283 ~ 301
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bradbrook, M. C / 1941 / Authority, Truth, and Justice in Measure for Measure / Review of English Studies 17 : 385 ~ 399
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Diehl, Huston / 1998 / Infinite Space: Representation and Performance in Measure for Measure / Shakespeare Quarterly 49 : 393 ~ 341
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『자에는 자로』(Measure for Measure)에서 공작의 변장잠행의 숨겨진 목적
Shakespeare Review
2019 .09
-
『이척도척』 : 통치자의 개체화 과정
Shakespeare Review
2001 .12
-
Measure for Measure: Duke의 자아 정립을 위한 희극적 여정 구조
Shakespeare Review
1990 .06
-
감시와 처벌 : 『자에는 자로』에 나타난 권력의 속성
Shakespeare Review
2015 .09
-
『자에는 자로』에 나타난 성, 종교, 그리고 권력
Shakespeare Review
2001 .06
-
Homosocial Rivalry for Spirituality in Measure for Measure
고전 르네상스 영문학
2016 .01
-
두 얼굴의 주공
동양고전연구
2019 .01
-
무대로 재현된 권력과 욕망 : 『자에는 자로』를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2001 .03
-
셰익스피어의 『자에는 자로』와 베이컨의 『새로운 아틀란티스』
Shakespeare Review
2003 .06
-
Sexuality, Religion and Power in Measure for Measure
영어영문학연구
2003 .01
-
Justice and Atonement in Measure for Measure
신영어영문학
2006 .11
-
『자에는 자로』와 『정숙한 창녀 2부』의 권위 : 공작 인물 형상화를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2014 .12
-
가부장적 관점에서 본 셰익스피어의 『좋으실 대로』
Shakespeare Review
2019 .03
-
周公의 文化개혁과 政治철학
동양철학연구
2005 .01
-
『자에는 자로』에서 청교도주의를 통한 마키아벨리적 전략과 그 한계
Shakespeare Review
2012 .06
-
被創造的“三監之亂”的記憶 — 以與周公旦的關係為中心 —
동양고전연구
2019 .01
-
『자에는 자로』에 나타난 연극의 정치성
Shakespeare Review
2014 .03
-
『당신 뜻대로』에서 아든 숲에서 듀크가 만난 ‘노 수도자’는 누구인가?
Shakespeare Review
2018 .12
-
민주주의과 아시아주의의 교차 : 미국 듀크(Duke)대학에서 일어났던 한중유학생들 사이의 “분쟁”과 그 의미
중국근현대사연구
1999 .06
-
『자에는 자로』에 드러난 비희극의 반어적 비전
Shakespeare Review
2012 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
정의를 기다리며 : 『자에는 자로』에 나타난 법의 문제
한용재
Shakespeare Review
2006
.03
『리처드 3세』(Richard III)에 나타난 악의 비전 : 반복과 고착, 무와 무능
김문규
Shakespeare Review
2015
.12
영국 르네상스 복수비극의 전복적 욕망
강석주
Shakespeare Review
2010
.12
The Tragic Vision in Greek Tragedy, Shakespearean Tragedy and Noh Drama
Dongwook Kim
Shakespeare Review
2010
.06
21세기 셰익스피어 원저자론 논쟁 : 소네트를 중심으로
한영림
Shakespeare Review
2010
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003139370